|
||||||||||||||||||
Understanding surface states of topological insulatorsTopological electron states were theoretically predicted by B.A. Volkov and O.A. Pankratov in 1985 as interface states in an inverted contact between IV—VI semiconductors with their bands mutually inverted. As became clear later, the `inverted' SnTe semiconductor is a topological insulator, and the inverted contact is an example of a topologically nontrivial interface. This paper discusses the key results of Volkov and Pankratov's 1985 work and examines the usefulness of the inverted contact model for explaining the close link between the topologically nontrivial bulk band structure and the topological surface states. An advantage of the model for getting a deeper insight into this link is that it allows for an analytical solution. An inhomogeneous semiconductor structure is described by an effective Dirac Hamiltonian, which was obtained analytically from a tight binding model for the band structure of IV—VI materials. This allows one to trace the relation between topological surface states and bands in the bulk. As a result, the spin texture of a topological state can be expressed explicitly in terms of the bulk characteristics. It turns out that the spin texture can be controlled by varying the surface band bending. Given the nontrivial spin polarization at the surface, it is interesting to take a look at the Ruderman—Kittel—Kasuya—Yosida. (RKKY) interaction between magnetic adatoms, which can serve for probing the spin distribution locally. This interaction shows a much more complex structure than the common RKKY coupling in a non-polarized Fermi gas. The analytical theory provides an explicit relation between the RKKY interaction at the surface of a topological insulator and the parameters of the bulk spectrum.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|