Issues

 / 

2021

 / 

October

  

Physics of our days


Proton charge radius

  a,  a, b
a Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
b International Center for Quantum Optics and Quantum Technologies (the Russian Quantum Center), ul. Novaya 100, Skolkovo, Moscow Region, 143025, Russian Federation

The so-called proton charge radius puzzle was one of the challenging problems in physics in the last decade. A significant (at the level of four standard deviations (4σ) difference between the values of the root-mean-square proton charge radius measured in normal and muonic hydrogen has kindled lively discussions among both experimentalists and theoreticians specializing in quantum electrodynamics. The problem becomes even more glaring (up to 7σ) if data on the scattering of electrons on protons are taken into account. We review various methods that enable measurement of the proton charge radius, analyze the origin of the disagreement, and present results of recent experiments that aim at resolving this puzzle.

Typically, an English fulltext is available in about 3 months from the date of publication of the original article.

Keywords: proton radius, hydrogen atom, muonic hydrogen, proton radius puzzle, Rydberg constant, single-photon spectroscopy, e-p scattering
PACS: 06.20.Jr, 06.30.Ft, 12.20.Fv, 32.10.Fn, 32.30.Jc, 42.62.Fi (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2021.06.038986
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2021/10/d/
Citation: Khabarova K Yu, Kolachevsky N N "Proton charge radius" Phys. Usp. 64 1038–1048 (2021)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 11th, February 2021, revised: 4th, June 2021, 6th, June 2021

Оригинал: Хабарова К Ю, Колачевский Н Н «Зарядовый радиус протона» УФН 191 1095–1106 (2021); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2021.06.038986

References (96) Similar articles (10) ↓

  1. S.G. Karshenboim “Progress in the accuracy of the fundamental physical constants: 2010 CODATA recommended values56 883–909 (2013)
  2. P.G. Kryukov “Femtosecond lasers for astrophysics58 762–771 (2015)
  3. V.I. Zhukova, A.V. Nefediev et alSuper-factory of bottomed hadrons Belle II64 468–494 (2021)
  4. S.G. Karshenboim “Fundamental physical constants: their role in physics and metrology and recommended values48 255–280 (2005)
  5. I.M. Dremin “The interaction region of high energy protons58 61–70 (2015)
  6. D.Yu. Akimov, V.A. Belov et alCoherent elastic neutrino-atomic nucleus scattering — recently discovered type of low-energy neutrino interaction62 166–178 (2019)
  7. L.B. Okun “The fundamental constants of physics34 (9) 818–826 (1991)
  8. V.S. Letokhov “Laser light, atoms, and nuclei30 897–909 (1987)
  9. I.L. Rozental’ “Physical laws and the numerical values of fundamental constants23 296–305 (1980)
  10. H. Walther “One-atom maser and other experiments on cavity quantum electrodynamics39 727–743 (1996)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2022 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions