Issues

 / 

2008

 / 

May

←  →

From the history of physics


The Einstein formula: E0 = mc2. “Isn’t the Lord laughing?”


Russian Federation State Scientific Center ‘A.I. Alikhanov Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics’, ul. Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow, 117259, Russian Federation

The article traces the way Einstein formulated the relation between energy and mass in his work from 1905 to 1955. Einstein emphasized quite often that the mass m of a body is equivalent to its rest energy E0. At the same time, he frequently resorted to the less clear-cut statement of the equivalence of energy and mass. As a result, Einstein’s formula E0 = mc2 still remains much less known than its popular form, E = mc2, in which E is the total energy equal to the sum of the rest energy and the kinetic energy of a freely moving body. One of the consequences of this is the widespread fallacy that the mass of a body increases when its velocity increases and even that this is an experimental fact. As wrote the playwright A N Ostrovsky “Something must exist for people, something so austere, so lofty, so sacrosanct that it would make profaning it unthinkable.”

Fulltext pdf (285 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.1070/PU2008v051n05ABEH006538
PACS: 01.10.Fv, 05.70.Fh, 75.40.−s (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU2008v051n05ABEH006538
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2008/5/g/
000259376200007
2-s2.0-51649086688
2008PhyU...51..513O
Citation: Okun L B "The Einstein formula: E0 = mc2. "Isn't the Lord laughing?"" Phys. Usp. 51 513–527 (2008)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Окунь Л Б «Формула Эйнштейна: E0 = mc2. «Не смеётся ли Господь Бог»?» УФН 178 541–555 (2008); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0178.200805g.0541

References (123) Cited by (19) Similar articles (14) ↓

  1. I.Yu. Kobzarev “Henri Poincaré’s St. Louis lecture, and theoretical physics on the eve of the theory of relativity” Sov. Phys. Usp. 17 584–592 (1975)
  2. N.N. Semenov “The road into science” Sov. Phys. Usp. 29 385–386 (1986)
  3. N.A. Smirnova “S. I. Vavilov in the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences” Sov. Phys. Usp. 17 960–961 (1975)
  4. I.M. Ternov, V.A. Bordovitsyn “Modern interpretation of J.I. Frenkel’s classical spin theory” Sov. Phys. Usp. 23 679–683 (1980)
  5. L.B. Okun “V A Fock and gauge symmetry” Phys. Usp. 53 835–837 (2010)
  6. G.B. Malykin, V.S. Savchuk, E.A. Romanets “Lev Yakovlevich Strum and the hypothesis of the existence of tachyons” Phys. Usp. 55 1134–1139 (2012)
  7. P.A. Druzhinin “"Physics is supposed to be spoken of with a bit of irony": unknown speech by L.D. Landau, 8 April 1960” Phys. Usp. 61 105–110 (2018)
  8. A.A. Logunov, M.A. Mestvirishvili, V.A. Petrov “How were the Hilbert-Einstein equations discovered?” Phys. Usp. 47 607–621 (2004)
  9. D.E. Burlankov “Gravity and absolute space. The works of Niels Bjern (1865-1909)” Phys. Usp. 47 833–844 (2004)
  10. G.I. Marchuk, V.S. Imshennik, M.M. Basko “The physics of a thermonuclear explosion of a normal-density liquefied deuterium sphere (On the impossibility of a spherically symmetric thermonuclear explosion in liquid deuterium at normal density)” Phys. Usp. 52 267–273 (2009)
  11. Yu.B. Rumer “Stories by Yurii Borisovich Rumer” Phys. Usp. 44 1082–1087 (2001)
  12. V.P. Vizgin “On the discovery of the gravitational field equations by Einstein and Hilbert: new materials” Phys. Usp. 44 1283–1298 (2001)
  13. I.I. Gurevich, Ya.B. Zeldovich et al “Utilization of the nuclear energy of the light elements” Sov. Phys. Usp. 34 (5) 445–446 (1991)
  14. I.M. Frank “Einstein and optics” Sov. Phys. Usp. 22 975–986 (1979)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions