The critique of quantum mind: measurement, consciousness, delayed choice, and lost coherence

A.M. Zheltikov^{a, b, c, d}
^aLomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobevy Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
^bTexas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
^cNational Research Centre ‘Kurchatov Institute’, pl. akad. Kurchatova 1, Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
^dInternational Center for Quantum Optics and Quantum Technologies (the Russian Quantum Center), ul. Novaya 100, Skolkovo, Moscow Region, 143025, Russian Federation

The formal logic of many celebrated paradoxes of quantum measurements does not rule out the effect of observer's mind on the outcome of a measurement and even on a prehistory of a quantum system. The modern methodology of quantum mechanics offers a consistent explanation of the role of observer's consciousness in physical measurements in universal terms of interaction of a quantum system with environment, loss of quantum coherence, and unitary evolution of the state vector. In this picture, observer's consciousness is no longer an agent that changes the prehistory of a quantum system, but is rather an object of physical study. Instruments and methods based on quantum physics open a new phase in such studies.

Keywords: measurements in quantum mechanics, observer in quantum measurement, quantum decoherence
PACS: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Yz, 03.67.−a (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2017.06.038155
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2018/10/f/
Web of Science

000454141800006
Scopus

2-s2.0-85059188927
ADS NASA

2018PhyU...61.1016Z
Citation: Zheltikov A M "The critique of quantum mind: measurement, consciousness, delayed choice, and lost coherence" Phys. Usp. 61 1016–1025 (2018)

BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 24th, April 2017, revised: 16th, June 2017, accepted: 21st, June 2017

Оригинал: Жёлтиков А М «Критика квантового разума: измерение, сознание, отложенный выбор и утраченная когерентность» УФН 188 1119–1128 (2018); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2017.06.038155

References (101) Cited by (14) Similar articles (20) ↓

A.V. Belinsky “Wigner's friend paradox: does objective reality not exist?” Phys. Usp. 63 1256–1263 (2020)
A.A. Grib “On the problem of the interpretation of quantum physics” Phys. Usp. 56 1230–1244 (2013)
A.V. Belinsky, A.A. Klevtsov “Nonlocal classical "realism" and quantum superposition as the nonexistence of definite pre-measurement values of physical quantities” Phys. Usp. 61 313–319 (2018)
S.P. Vyatchanin, F.Ya. Khalili “’Interaction-free’ measurement: possibilities and limitations” Phys. Usp. 47 705–716 (2004)
A.V. Belinsky “On David Bohm's 'pilot-wave' concept” Phys. Usp. 62 1268–1278 (2019)
N.N. Rosanov, R.M. Arkhipov, M.V. Arkhipov “On laws of conservation in electrodynamics of continuous media (on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the S.I. Vavilov State Optical Institute)” Phys. Usp. 61 1227–1233 (2018)
A.V. Belinsky, M.Kh. Shulman “Quantum nature of a nonlinear beam splitter” Phys. Usp. 57 1022–1034 (2014)
A.V. Belinskii, A.S. Chirkin “Bernstein’s paradox of entangled quantum states” Phys. Usp. 56 1126–1131 (2013)
B.B. Kadomtsev “Irreversibility in quantum mechanics” Phys. Usp. 46 1183–1201 (2003)
V.S. Pronskikh “Measurement problems: contemporary discussions and models” Phys. Usp. 63 192–200 (2020)
B.B. Kadomtsev “Classical and quantum irreversibility” Phys. Usp. 38 923–929 (1995)
F.Ya. Khalili “Zero-point oscillations, zero-point fluctuations, and fluctuations of zero-point oscillations” Phys. Usp. 46 293–307 (2003)
A.A. Voronin, A.M. Zheltikov “Nonlinear dynamics of high-power ultrashort laser pulses: exaflop computations on a laboratory station and subcycle light bullets” Phys. Usp. 59 869–877 (2016)
N.N. Rosanov “Unipolar pulse of an electromagnetic field with uniform motion of a charge in a vacuum” Phys. Usp. 66 1059–1064 (2023)
V.Yu. Shishkov, E.S. Andrianov et al “Relaxation of interacting open quantum systems” Phys. Usp. 62 510–523 (2019)
A.N. Rubtsov “On the question of measurement in quantum mechanics” Phys. Usp. 66 734–740 (2023)
A.S. Trushechkin, E.O. Kiktenko et al “Security of the decoy state method for quantum key distribution” Phys. Usp. 64 88–102 (2021)
V.V. Mityugov “The tree of paradox” Phys. Usp. 36 (8) 744–753 (1993)
M.B. Mensky “Measurability of quantum fields and the energy—time uncertainty relation” Phys. Usp. 54 519–528 (2011)
I.M. Arbekov, S.N. Molotkov “Extraction of quantum randomness” Phys. Usp. 64 617–634 (2021)

The list is formed automatically.