Issues

 / 

2013

 / 

September

  

Methodological notes


The relativistic virial theorem and scale invariance


Instituto Universitario de Microgravedad ‘Ignacio Da Riva’ de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, Madrid, E-28040, Spain

The virial theorem is related to the dilatation properties of bound states, as seen in particular from the relativistic virial theorem formulated (by Landau and Lifshitz) in terms of the energy-momentum tensor trace. In the Hamiltonian formulation of dilatations we propose here, the relativistic virial theorem naturally arises as a stability condition against dilatations. A bound state becomes scale invariant in the ultrarelativistic limit, in which its energy vanishes. However, for very relativistic bound states, scale invariance is broken by quantum effects, necessitating including the energy-momentum tensor trace anomaly into the virial theorem. This quantum field theory virial theorem is directly related to the Callan — Symanzik equations. The virial theorem is applied to QED and then to QCD, focusing on the hadronic bag model. In massless QCD, 3/4 of the hadron mass corresponds to quarks and gluons and 1/4 to the trace anomaly, according to the virial theorem.

Fulltext pdf (596 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0183.201309f.0973
PACS: 03.30.+p, 11.10.St, 12.38.Aw, 12.39.Ba (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0183.201309f.0973
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2013/9/e/
000328748500005
2-s2.0-84890510622
2013PhyU...56..919G
Citation: Gaite José "The relativistic virial theorem and scale invariance" Phys. Usp. 56 919–931 (2013)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 7th, February 2013, 27th, February 2013

Оригинал: Гаите Х «Релятивистская теорема вириала и масштабная инвариантность» УФН 183 973–986 (2013); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0183.201309f.0973

References (43) Cited by (10) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. P.B. Ivanov “On relativistic motion of a pair of particles having opposite signs of massesPhys. Usp. 55 1232–1238 (2012)
  2. V.A. Aleshkevich “On special relativity teaching using modern experimental dataPhys. Usp. 55 1214–1231 (2012)
  3. V.I. Ritus “Permutation asymmetry of the relativistic velocity addition law and non-Euclidean geometryPhys. Usp. 51 709–721 (2008)
  4. A.I. Musienko, L.I. Manevich “Classical mechanical analogs of relativistic effectsPhys. Usp. 47 797–820 (2004)
  5. Yu.I. Hovsepyan “Some notes on the relativistic Doppler effectPhys. Usp. 41 941–944 (1998)
  6. V.B. Morozov “On the question of the electromagnetic momentum of a charged bodyPhys. Usp. 54 371–374 (2011)
  7. G.B. Malykin “The Sagnac effect: correct and incorrect explanationsPhys. Usp. 43 1229 (2000)
  8. S.I. Syrovatskii “On the problem of the ’retardation’ of the relativistic contraction of moving bodiesSov. Phys. Usp. 19 273–274 (1976)
  9. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Force acting on a substance in an electromagnetic fieldPhys. Usp. 52 937–943 (2009)
  10. V.I. Ritus “Lagrange equations of motion of particles and photons in the Schwarzschild fieldPhys. Usp. 58 1118–1123 (2015)
  11. X.-B. Huang “A rigorous minimum-assumption derivation of the Lorentz transformationPhys. Usp. 54 529–532 (2011)
  12. G.B. Malykin “Para-Lorentz transformationsPhys. Usp. 52 263–266 (2009)
  13. V.P. Neznamov “Mathematical paradoxes of Dirac equation representationsPhys. Usp. 68 1283–1288 (2025)
  14. G.B. Malykin “The relation of Thomas precession to Ishlinskii’s theorem as applied to the rotating image of a relativistically moving bodyPhys. Usp. 42 505–509 (1999)
  15. A.A. Logunov “The theory of the classical gravitational fieldPhys. Usp. 38 179–193 (1995)
  16. V.L. Ginzburg, V.P. Frolov “Vacuum in a homogeneous gravitational field and excitation of a uniformly accelerated detectorSov. Phys. Usp. 30 1073–1095 (1987)
  17. S.P. Kulik, S.N. Molotkov “Relativistic quantum key distribution between stationary objects based on coherent statesPhys. Usp., accepted
  18. G.B. Malykin “Sagnac effect in ring lasers and ring resonators. How does the refraction index of the optical medium influence the sensitivity to rotation?Phys. Usp. 57 714–720 (2014)
  19. M.I. Krivoruchenko “Rotation of the swing plane of Foucault’s pendulum and Thomas spin precession: two sides of one coinPhys. Usp. 52 821–829 (2009)
  20. V.I. Ritus “On the difference between Wigner’s and Møller’s approaches to the description of Thomas precessionPhys. Usp. 50 95–101 (2007)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions