Complementarity, physics, and biology

The views of Niels Bohr on complementarity are examined, both in physics and in other fields. N. Bohr's opinions on the relationship between physics and biology are discussed in detail. It is shown that, over a number of years, Bohr viewed as complementary the study of organisms as atomic-molecular and as integral systems. Subsequently, owing to the development of molecular biology, Bohr rejected the idea of the complementarity in principle of the stated two types of studies. The current status of the physical theory of biological phenomena is examined, and the role of synergetics in this field is noted. The so-called antireductionism is criticized. It is shown that the views of contemporary eminent theoretical biologists reveal them to be unfamiliar with physics. The very important role of physics in the further development of biology and its practical applications is emphasized.

PACS: 01.65.+g, 87.15.−v (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU1988v031n02ABEH005698
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/1988/2/c/
Citation: Vol’kenshtein M V "Complementarity, physics, and biology" Sov. Phys. Usp. 31 140–150 (1988)

BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Волькенштейн М В «Дополнительность, физика и биология» УФН 154 279–297 (1988); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0154.198802e.0279

N. Bohr is author of Physics-Uspekhi

References (48) Cited by (7) Similar articles (20) ↓

V.P. Reutov, A.N. Schechter “How in the 20th century physicists, chemists and biologists answered the question: what is life?” Phys. Usp. 53 377–396 (2010)
M.I. Monastyrskii “John von Neumann” Phys. Usp. 47 1271–1280 (2004)
B. Pontecorvo “Pages in the development of neutrino physics” Sov. Phys. Usp. 26 1087–1108 (1983)
V.I. Sanyuk, A.D. Sukhanov “Dirac in 20th century physics: a centenary assessment” Phys. Usp. 46 937–956 (2003)
K.N. Mukhin, A.F. Sustavov, V.N. Tikhonov “On the centenary of the Nobel Prize: Russian laureates in physics” Phys. Usp. 46 493–547 (2003)
V.P. Milant’ev “Creation and development of Bohr’s theory (on the 90th anniversary of the Bohr theory of the atom)” Phys. Usp. 47 197–203 (2004)
D.E. Burlankov “Gravity and absolute space. The works of Niels Bjern (1865-1909)” Phys. Usp. 47 833–844 (2004)
V.L. Ginzburg “Tricentenary of Isaac Newton’s ’Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy’” Sov. Phys. Usp. 30 46–59 (1987)
P.P. Lazarev “Historical essay on the 200 years of the development of natural sciences in Russia” Phys. Usp. 42 1247–1257 (1999)
O.G. Bakunin “Mysteries of diffusion and labyrinths of destiny” Phys. Usp. 46 309–313 (2003)
G.B. Malykin, S.A. Kharlamov “Topological phase in classical mechanics” Phys. Usp. 46 957–965 (2003)
D.G. Yakovlev, P. Haensel et al “L D Landau and the concept of neutron stars” Phys. Usp. 56 289–295 (2013)
G.G. Denisov, A.G. Litvak, A.M. Sergeev “Andrey Viktorovich Gaponov-Grekhov: a brief essay on his life and scientific activity (to the 100th anniversary of his birth)” Phys. Usp. 69 621–628 (2026)
K. Barley, A. Ruffing, S.K. Suslov “Old quantum mechanics by Bohr and Sommerfeld from modern perspective” Phys. Usp. 69 74–93 (2026)
I.M. Frank “N. Bohr’s model of compound nuclei and parity violation” Sov. Phys. Usp. 29 777–779 (1986)
I.M. Frank “A conceptual history of the Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation” Sov. Phys. Usp. 27 385–395 (1984)
M.A. El’yashevich, N.G. Kembrovskaya, L.M. Tomil’chik “Walter Ritz as a theoretical physicist and his research on the theory of atomic spectra” Phys. Usp. 38 435–455 (1995)
V.A. Koptsik, I.S. Rez “Pierre Curie’s works in the field of crystal physics (on the one-hundredth anniversary of the discovery of the piezoelectric effect)” Sov. Phys. Usp. 24 426–428 (1981)
G.A. Goncharov “American and Soviet H-bomb development programmes: historical background” Phys. Usp. 39 1033–1044 (1996)
B.I. Spasskii, L.V. Levshin, V.A. Krasil’nikov “Physics and astronomy at Moscow University (On the University’s 225th anniversary)” Sov. Phys. Usp. 23 78–93 (1980)

The list is formed automatically.