Issues

 / 

2018

 / 

March

  

Methodological notes


On choosing the energy—momentum tensor in electrodynamics and on the Abraham force


Research and Design Institute of Radioelectronic Engineering, Branch of M.V. Protsenko Federal Research and Development Center Production Association &guot;Start&guot;, Mira str. 1/1, Zarechnyi, Penza region, 442965, Russian Federation

The well-debated problem of choosing the energy—momentum tensor in electrodynamics is examined. Electromagnetic forces in a continuum medium that follow from Minkowski's and Abraham's tensors are considered. It is shown that the conservation equations for both Minkovski's momentum density and for Abraham's impulse simultaneously follow from Minkowski's tensor and that they are the components of a composite electromagnetic pulse in the medium. It is shown that choosing canonical material equations reduces the Abraham force to zero. Considerations are presented which uniquely favor choosing the Minkowski tensor and show the incompleteness of the Abraham tensor.

Fulltext is available at IOP
Keywords: the electromagnetic force, tensor of energy--momentum, Minkowski tensor, Abraham tensor, Abraham force
PACS: 03.50.De, 41.20.Jb (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2017.11.038255
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2018/3/e/
Citation: Spirichev Yu A "On choosing the energy—momentum tensor in electrodynamics and on the Abraham force" Phys. Usp. 61 303–306 (2018)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 28th, January 2017, revised: 20th, November 2017, 29th, November 2017

Оригинал: Спиричев Ю А «О выборе тензора энергии-импульса в электродинамике и силе Абрагама» УФН 188 325–328 (2018); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2017.11.038255

References (13) ↓ Cited by (2) Similar articles (20)

  1. Skobel’tsyn D V Usp. Fiz. Nauk 110 253 (1973); Skobel’tsyn D V Sov. Phys. Usp. 16 381 (1973)
  2. Ginzburg V L Usp. Fiz. Nauk 110 309 (1973); Ginzburg V L Sov. Phys. Usp. 16 434 (1973)
  3. Ginzburg V L, Ugarov V A Usp. Fiz. Nauk 118 175 (1976); Ginzburg V L, Ugarov V A Sov. Phys. Usp. 19 94 (1976)
  4. Veselago V G Usp. Fiz. Nauk 179 689 (2009); Veselago V G Phys. Usp. 52 649 (2009)
  5. Makarov V P, Rukhadze A A Usp. Fiz. Nauk 179 995 (2009); Makarov V P, Rukhadze A A Phys. Usp. 52 937 (2009)
  6. Veselago V G, Shchavlev V V Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 331 (2010); Veselago V G, Shchavlev V V Phys. Usp. 53 317 (2010)
  7. Davidovich M V Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 623 (2010); Davidovich M V Phys. Usp. 53 595 (2010)
  8. Makarov V P, Rukhadze A A Usp. Fiz. Nauk 181 1357 (2011); Makarov V P, Rukhadze A A Phys. Usp. 54 1285 (2011)
  9. Veselago V G Usp. Fiz. Nauk 181 1201 (2011); Veselago V G Phys. Usp. 54 1161 (2011)
  10. Toptygin I N, Levina K Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 146 (2016); Toptygin I N, Levina K Phys. Usp. 59 141 (2016)
  11. Brevik I Ann. Physics 377 10 (2017)
  12. McDonald "Bibliography on the Abraham—Minkowski debate" (2017) http://physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/ambib.pdf, February 17, 2015: updated September 29
  13. Spirichev Yu A arXiv:1708.04578

© 1918–2022 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions