Issues

 / 

2015

 / 

March

  

Letters to the editors


Relation between energy conservation and dynamics (Comment on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" by N.A. Vinokurov (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))


Tyumen State University, Semakov st. 25, Tyumen, 625003, Russian Federation

Possible applications of the relation between the equation of dynamics and the energy conservation are considered. It is shown that the method used in the paper by N.A. Vinokurov (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]) should be re-examined to accurately understand the role of gyroscopic forces.

Fulltext is available at IOP
Keywords: energy, Lagrangian, gyroscopic forces
PACS: 02.30.Em, 02.30.Hq, 45.20.−d, 45.50.−j (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201503f.0333
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2015/3/e/
Citation: Arinstein E A "Relation between energy conservation and dynamics (Comment on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" by N.A. Vinokurov (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))" Phys. Usp. 58 309–310 (2015)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 24th, September 2014, 29th, October 2014

Оригинал: Аринштейн Э А «Связь закона сохранения энергии и динамики (Комментарий к статье Н.А. Винокурова "Вывод уравнений аналитической механики и теории поля из закона сохранения энергии" [УФН 184 641 (2014)])» УФН 185 333–334 (2015); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0185.201503f.0333

References (1) Cited by (1) Similar articles (9) ↓

  1. N.A. Vinokurov “Relation between energy conservation and equations of motion (A reply to the comment by E A Arinshtein (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 333 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 (3) (2015)]) on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))58 311–312 (2015)
  2. A.I. Lipkin, R.S. Nakhmanson et alReaders comments on ‘Quantum mechanics: new experiments, new applications, new formulations’ by M B Menskii44 417–417 (2001)
  3. S.P. Kuznetsov “On the validity of nonholonomic model of the rattleback58 1223–1224 (2015)
  4. A.V. Melkikh “First principles of probability theory and some paradoxes in modern biology (comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?” by G R Ivanitskii)54 429–430 (2011)
  5. G.R. Ivanitskii “Remembering a random choice kills alternatives (reply to comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?”)54 431–433 (2011)
  6. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Negative group velocity electromagnetic waves and the energy—momentum tensor54 1285–1296 (2011)
  7. M.L. Shmatov “Once again on the Gatchina discharge and ball lightning (comments on G.D. Shabanov's paper "On the possibility of making natural ball lightning using a new pulse discharge type in the laboratory" [Phys. Usp. 62 92 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 95 (2019)])63 96–98 (2020)
  8. G.D. Shabanov “Lightning ball: experiments on creation and hypotheses (comment on “Energy density calculations for ball-lightning-like luminous silicon balls” by G S Paiva, J V Ferreira, C C Bastos, M V P dos Santos, A C Pavão)53 215–216 (2010)
  9. V.L. Ginzburg “On heat transfer (heat conduction) and the thermoelectric effect in the superconducting state41 307–311 (1998)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2020 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions