Issues

 / 

2015

 / 

January

←  →

Physics of our days


The interaction region of high energy protons


Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

New proton--proton collision data from the LHC have extended considerably the energy range over which the structure of the proton—proton interaction region can be studied. This paper combines the unitarity relation with experimental data on elastic scattering in the diffraction cone to show how the shape and the darkness of the inelastic interaction region of colliding protons change with increasing proton energy. In particular, at LHC energies small-impact-parameter collisions become fully absorptive, with some implications for inelastic processes as well. The possibility of changing from the black core scenario at LHC energies to the fully transparent scenario at higher energies is discussed — a phenomenon that implies changing from the black disk to black toroid terminology. As the asymptotic behavior is approached, a different regime may arise. The parameter determining the opacity of central collisions also crucially affects the differential cross section of elastic scattering outside the diffraction cone, where all phenomenological models fail for LHC energies. It is in this region where the ratio of real to imaginary part of the elastic scattering amplitude at nonforward scattering becomes a determining factor — as indeed it should according to the unitarity condition. Our results make it possible for the first time to estimate this ratio outside the diffraction cone by comparison with data for LHC energies, and it turns out to be drastically different from the values measured at forward scattering. Moreover, both the real and imaginary parts are found to behave differently in different phenomenological models and in the approach based on the unitarity condition. This problem is still to be resolved. All the conclusions are made solely within the framework of the indubitable unitarity condition using experimental data on elastic proton scattering in the diffraction cone and making no use of other theoretical methods, such as quantum chromodynamics or phenomenological models.

Fulltext pdf (562 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201501d.0065
Keywords: Protons, interaction region, elastic scattering, inelastic processes, unitarity condition
PACS: 11.80.−m, 13.85.Dz, 14.20.Dh (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201501d.0065
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2015/1/d/
000352305900003
2-s2.0-84927145796
2015PhyU...58...61D
Citation: Dremin I M "The interaction region of high energy protons" Phys. Usp. 58 61–70 (2015)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 23rd, May 2014, revised: 3rd, June 2014, 15th, July 2014

Оригинал: Дрёмин И М «Область взаимодействия протонов высоких энергий» УФН 185 65–76 (2015); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0185.201501d.0065

References (27) Cited by (42) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. V.V. Anisovich “Universality of hadron cross section at ultrahigh energies” Phys. Usp. 58 963–967 (2015)
  2. I.M. Dremin “Some new discoveries at colliders” Phys. Usp. 61 381–388 (2018)
  3. I.M. Dremin, D.O. Chernyshov “Low-energy positrons and gamma photons in the Galaxy” Phys. Usp. 68 668–674 (2025)
  4. I.M. Dremin “Ultraperipheral nuclear interactions” Phys. Usp. 63 758–765 (2020)
  5. I.M. Dremin, C. Quigg “Clusters in hadron multiple production processes” Sov. Phys. Usp. 21 265–271 (1978)
  6. U. Amaldi “How protons are seen by high energy hadrons” Sov. Phys. Usp. 21 328–344 (1978)
  7. A.P. Serebrov “Disagreement between measurements of the neutron lifetime by the ultracold neutron storage method and the beam technique” Phys. Usp. 62 596–601 (2019)
  8. D.Yu. Akimov, V.A. Belov et al “Coherent elastic neutrino-atomic nucleus scattering — recently discovered type of low-energy neutrino interaction” Phys. Usp. 62 166–178 (2019)
  9. K.Yu. Khabarova, N.N. Kolachevsky “Proton charge radius” Phys. Usp. 64 1038–1048 (2021)
  10. Yu.A. Mostovoi, K.N. Mukhin, O.O. Patarakin “The neutron yesterday, today, and tomorrow” Phys. Usp. 39 925–958 (1996)
  11. S.G. Karshenboim “Progress in the accuracy of the fundamental physical constants: 2010 CODATA recommended values” Phys. Usp. 56 883–909 (2013)
  12. V.M. Kuleshov, V.D. Mur et al “Coulomb problem for a Z>Zcr” Phys. Usp. 58 785–791 (2015)
  13. L. Van Hove “Hadrons and quarks in high energy collisions” Sov. Phys. Usp. 21 252–264 (1978)
  14. A.L. Buchachenko “Microwave stimulation of dislocations and the magnetic control of the earthquake core” Phys. Usp. 62 46–53 (2019)
  15. K.V. Ptitsyna, S.V. Troitsky “Physical conditions in potential accelerators of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays: updated Hillas plot and radiation-loss constraints” Phys. Usp. 53 691–701 (2010)
  16. V.I. Dokuchaev, N.O. Nazarova “Silhouettes of invisible black holes” Phys. Usp. 63 583–600 (2020)
  17. M.V. Sadovskii “Planckian relaxation delusion in metals” Phys. Usp. 64 175–190 (2021)
  18. G. Veneziano “An evolving look at Pomeranchuk scattering” Phys. Usp. 43 177–180 (2000)
  19. D.R.O. Morrison “The steady vanishing of the three solar neutrino problems” Phys. Usp. 38 543–553 (1995)
  20. Yu.M. Ado “High-energy charged-particle accelerators” Sov. Phys. Usp. 28 54–69 (1985)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions