Issues

 / 

2015

 / 

January

  

Physics of our days


The interaction region of high energy protons


Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

New proton--proton collision data from the LHC have extended considerably the energy range over which the structure of the proton—proton interaction region can be studied. This paper combines the unitarity relation with experimental data on elastic scattering in the diffraction cone to show how the shape and the darkness of the inelastic interaction region of colliding protons change with increasing proton energy. In particular, at LHC energies small-impact-parameter collisions become fully absorptive, with some implications for inelastic processes as well. The possibility of changing from the black core scenario at LHC energies to the fully transparent scenario at higher energies is discussed — a phenomenon that implies changing from the black disk to black toroid terminology. As the asymptotic behavior is approached, a different regime may arise. The parameter determining the opacity of central collisions also crucially affects the differential cross section of elastic scattering outside the diffraction cone, where all phenomenological models fail for LHC energies. It is in this region where the ratio of real to imaginary part of the elastic scattering amplitude at nonforward scattering becomes a determining factor — as indeed it should according to the unitarity condition. Our results make it possible for the first time to estimate this ratio outside the diffraction cone by comparison with data for LHC energies, and it turns out to be drastically different from the values measured at forward scattering. Moreover, both the real and imaginary parts are found to behave differently in different phenomenological models and in the approach based on the unitarity condition. This problem is still to be resolved. All the conclusions are made solely within the framework of the indubitable unitarity condition using experimental data on elastic proton scattering in the diffraction cone and making no use of other theoretical methods, such as quantum chromodynamics or phenomenological models.

Fulltext pdf (562 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201501d.0065
Keywords: Protons, interaction region, elastic scattering, inelastic processes, unitarity condition
PACS: 11.80.−m, 13.85.Dz, 14.20.Dh (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201501d.0065
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2015/1/d/
000352305900003
2-s2.0-84927145796
2015PhyU...58...61D
Citation: Dremin I M "The interaction region of high energy protons" Phys. Usp. 58 61–70 (2015)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 23rd, May 2014, revised: 3rd, June 2014, 15th, July 2014

Оригинал: Дрёмин И М «Область взаимодействия протонов высоких энергий» УФН 185 65–76 (2015); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0185.201501d.0065

References (27) Cited by (43) ↓ Similar articles (14)

  1. Leonidov A V Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 194 951 (2024)
  2. [Leonidov A V Phys. Usp. 67 897 (2024)]
  3. Csörgő T, Hegyi S, Szanyi I Universe 9 361 (2023)
  4. Nekrasov M  L Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) (2022)
  5. Kakkad H, Kohara A K, Kotko P Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (9) (2022)
  6. Campos S D Ukr. J. Phys. 67 151 (2022)
  7. Troshin S M, Tyurin N E Physics Letters B 816 136186 (2021)
  8. Nekrasov M L Particles 4 381 (2021)
  9. Csörgő T, Novák T et al Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2) (2021)
  10. Csörgő T, Szanyi I Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (7) (2021)
  11. Campos S D, Amarante A M Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 2050095 (2020)
  12. Campos S D, Okorokov V A, Moraes C V Phys. Scr. 95 025301 (2020)
  13. Dremin I M Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) (2020)
  14. Campos S D Phys. Scr. 95 065302 (2020)
  15. Csörgö T, Novák T et al EPJ Web Conf. 235 06002 (2020)
  16. Campos S D, Okorokov V A Phys. Scr. 95 095305 (2020)
  17. Dremin I Physics 1 33 (2019)
  18. Troshin S M, Tyurin N E J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 46 105009 (2019)
  19. Dremin I M Particles 2 57 (2019)
  20. Csörgő T, Yang A et al EPJ Web Conf. 206 06004 (2019)
  21. Campos S D Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 1950057 (2019)
  22. Samokhin A P Physics Letters B 786 100 (2018)
  23. Dremin I M, Nechitailo V A Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (11) (2018)
  24. Shaulov S B Phys. Atom. Nuclei 81 638 (2018)
  25. Petrov V A, Samokhin A P Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 47 1860097 (2018)
  26. Broniowski W, Jenkovszky L et al Phys. Rev. D 98 (7) (2018)
  27. Toneev V D, Voronyuk V et al Phys. Rev. C 95 (3) (2017)
  28. Dremin I M Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 187 353 (2017) [Dremin I M Phys.-Usp. 60 333 (2017)]
  29. Dremin I M Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 1750073 (2017)
  30. Dremin I M Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 44 94 (2017)
  31. Dremin I M, Pattison B EPJ Web Conf. 145 10003 (2017)
  32. Giordano M, Meggiolaro E, Silva P  V  R  G Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) (2017)
  33. Karlovets D V J. High Energ. Phys. 2017 (3) (2017)
  34. Arriola E R, Broniowski W Phys. Rev. D 95 (7) (2017)
  35. Dremin I M, Nechitailo V A, White S N Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (12) (2017)
  36. Troshin S M, Tyurin N E Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 1650079 (2016)
  37. Anisovich V V, Nikonov V A, Nyiri J Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 1650053 (2016)
  38. Troshin S M, Tyurin N E Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 1650025 (2016)
  39. Dremin I M Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 1650107 (2016)
  40. Dremin I Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks - From Hagedorn Temperature to Ultra-Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at CERN Chapter 9 (2016) p. 75
  41. Karlovets D EPL 116 31001 (2016)
  42. Anisovich V V Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 185 1043 (2015) [Anisovich V V Phys.-Usp. 58 963 (2015)]
  43. Kovalenko V N, Puchkov A M et al 2015 Days on Diffraction (DD), (2015) p. 1

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions