Methodological notes

Foreshocks and aftershocks of strong earthquakes in the light of catastrophe theory

Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya ul. 10, Moscow, 123995, Russian Federation

In this review, general ideas and specific results from catastrophe theory and the theory of critical phenomena are applied to the analysis of strong earthquakes. Aspects given particular attention are the sharp rise in the fluctuation level, the increased reactivity of dynamical systems in the near-threshold region, and other anomalous phenomena similar to the critical opalescence. In the lack of a sufficiently developed theory of earthquakes, this appears to be a valid approach to the analysis of observations. The study performed brought out some nontrivial properties of a strong-earthquake source that manifest themselves both before and after the main rock discontinuity forms at the mainshock. In the course of the analysis of the foreshocks and aftershocks, such concepts as the round-the-world seismic echo, the cumulative effect of converging surface waves, and global seismicity modulation by the Earth's free oscillations are introduced. Further research in this direction is likely to be interesting and promising.

Fulltext pdf (691 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201504f.0415
Keywords: earthquake, critical phenomena, bifurcation, surface waves, spheroidal oscillations, cumulative effect, modulation of seismicity
PACS: 91.30.−f, 91.30.Px (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201504f.0415
Citation: Guglielmi A V "Foreshocks and aftershocks of strong earthquakes in the light of catastrophe theory" Phys. Usp. 58 384–397 (2015)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 23rd, May 2014, 7th, November 2014

Оригинал: Гульельми А В «Форшоки и афтершоки сильных землетрясений в свете теории катастроф» УФН 185 415–429 (2015); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0185.201504f.0415

References (58) Cited by (17) Similar articles (8) ↓

  1. A.L. Buchachenko “Magnetoplasticity and the physics of earthquakes. Can a catastrophe be prevented?57 92–98 (2014)
  2. A.M. Fridman, E.V. Polyachenko, N.R. Nasyrkanov “On some correlations in seismodynamics and on two components of Earth’s seismic activity53 291–300 (2010)
  3. G.S. Golitsyn “A N Kolmogorov's 1934 paper is the basis for explaining the statistics of natural phenomena of the macrocosm67 80–90 (2024)
  4. P.S. Landa, D.I. Trubetskov, V.A. Gusev “Delusions versus reality in some physics problems: theory and experiment52 235–255 (2009)
  5. V.I. Alshits, E.V. Darinskaya et alDislocation kinetics in nonmagnetic crystals: a look through a magnetic window60 305–318 (2017)
  6. E.N. Rumanov “Critical phenomena far from equilibrium56 93–102 (2013)
  7. Yu.L. Klimontovich “What are stochastic filtering and stochastic resonance?42 37–44 (1999)
  8. A.A. Logunov, M.A. Mestvirishvili, Yu.V. Chugreev “On incorrect formulations of the equivalence principle39 73–79 (1996)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions