Issues

 / 

2015

 / 

December

  

Letters to the editors


Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics

 a, b, c,  d
a Institute of Computer Science, ul. Universitetskaya1, Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation
b Udmurt State University, ul. Universitetskaya 1, Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation
c Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Institutskii per. 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, 141701, Russian Federation
d Udmurt State University, ul. Universitetskaya 1, Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation

This is a reply to the comment by V.F. Zhuravlev (see Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 1337 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 (12) (2015)]) on the inadequacy of the nonholonomic model when applied to the rolling of rigid bodies. The model of nonholonomic mechanics is discussed. Using recent results as examples, it is shown that the validity and potential of the nonholonomic model are not inferior to those of other dynamics and friction models.

Fulltext is available at IOP
Keywords: nonholonomic model, dry friction, rattleback, rolling motion of a rigid body
PACS: 05.45.−a, 45.40.−f (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201512g.1339
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2015/12/f/
Citation: Borisov A V, Mamaev I S "Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics" Phys. Usp. 58 1220–1222 (2015)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 8th, October 2015, 8th, October 2015

:   ,    « » 185 1339–1341 (2015); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0185.201512g.1339

References (27) Cited by (3) Similar articles (7) ↓

  1. S.P. Kuznetsov “On the validity of nonholonomic model of the rattleback58 1223–1224 (2015)
  2. V.F. Zhuravlev “Once more on the dynamics of the rattleback (comment on "Strange attractors in rattleback dynamics" by A.V. Borisov and I.S. Mamaev [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 173 407 (2003); Phys. Usp. 46 393 (2003)] and "Nonlinear dynamics of the rattleback: a nonholonomic model" by A.V. Borisov, A.O. Kazakov, S.P. Kuznetsov [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 493 (2014); Phys. Usp. 57 453 (2014)])58 1218–1219 (2015)
  3. G.R. Ivanitskii “Memory about the past is beneficial for survival and reproduction (reply to comment (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 182 1235 (2012) [Phys. Usp. 55 1152 (2012)]) by V I Klyatskin on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics” (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 337 (2010) [Phys. Usp. 53 327 (2010)]) by G R Ivanitskii)55 1155–1160 (2012)
  4. V.I. Klyatskin “Spatial structures can form in stochastic dynamic systems due to near-zero-probability events (comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?” (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 337 (2010) [Phys. Usp. 53 327 (2010)]) by G R Ivanitskii)55 1152–1154 (2012)
  5. S.N. Vladimirov “Does the sign correlation of quasiperiodic oscillations with incommensurable frequencies generate deterministic chaos?47 205–208 (2004)
  6. G.B. Malykin, V.I. Pozdnyakova “Supplement to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])58 828–829 (2015)
  7. A.E. Dubinov, L.A. Mytareva “Is singularity-free cloaking possible? New cloaking ideas (a reply to comments on the paper “Invisible cloaking of material bodies using the wave flow method” [Phys. Usp. 53 455 (2010)])55 315–318 (2012)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2021 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions