RSS feeds
РусскийEnglish
Issue 10, 2026
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2015

 / 

December

←  →

Letters to the editors


Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics

 a, b, c,  d
a Institute of Computer Science, ul. Universitetskaya 1, Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation
b Udmurt State University, ul. Universitetskaya 1, Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation
c Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Institutskii per. 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, 141700, Russian Federation
d Udmurt State University, ul. Universitetskaya 1, Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation

This is a reply to the comment by V.F. Zhuravlev (see Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 1337 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 (12) (2015)]) on the inadequacy of the nonholonomic model when applied to the rolling of rigid bodies. The model of nonholonomic mechanics is discussed. Using recent results as examples, it is shown that the validity and potential of the nonholonomic model are not inferior to those of other dynamics and friction models.

Fulltext pdf (325 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201512g.1339
Keywords: nonholonomic model, dry friction, rattleback, rolling motion of a rigid body
PACS: 05.45.−a, 45.40.−f (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0185.201512g.1339
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2015/12/f/
000371914300006
2-s2.0-84962916605
2015PhyU...58.1220B
Citation: Borisov A V, Mamaev I S "Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics" Phys. Usp. 58 1220–1222 (2015)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 8th, October 2015, 8th, October 2015

Оригинал: Борисов А В, Мамаев И С «Замечания о новых моделях трения и неголономной механике» УФН 185 1339–1341 (2015); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0185.201512g.1339

References (27) Cited by (3) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. S.P. Kuznetsov “On the validity of nonholonomic model of the rattleback” Phys. Usp. 58 1223–1224 (2015)
  2. V.F. Zhuravlev “Once more on the dynamics of the rattleback (comment on "Strange attractors in rattleback dynamics" by A.V. Borisov and I.S. Mamaev [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 173 407 (2003); Phys. Usp. 46 393 (2003)] and "Nonlinear dynamics of the rattleback: a nonholonomic model" by A.V. Borisov, A.O. Kazakov, S.P. Kuznetsov [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 493 (2014); Phys. Usp. 57 453 (2014)])” Phys. Usp. 58 1218–1219 (2015)
  3. G.R. Ivanitskii “Memory about the past is beneficial for survival and reproduction (reply to comment (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 182 1235 (2012) [Phys. Usp. 55 1152 (2012)]) by V I Klyatskin on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics” (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 337 (2010) [Phys. Usp. 53 327 (2010)]) by G R Ivanitskii)” Phys. Usp. 55 1155–1160 (2012)
  4. V.I. Klyatskin “Spatial structures can form in stochastic dynamic systems due to near-zero-probability events (comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?” (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 337 (2010) [Phys. Usp. 53 327 (2010)]) by G R Ivanitskii)” Phys. Usp. 55 1152–1154 (2012)
  5. N.A. Vinokurov “Relation between energy conservation and equations of motion (A reply to the comment by E A Arinshtein (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 333 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 (3) (2015)]) on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))” Phys. Usp. 58 311–312 (2015)
  6. G.I. Barenblatt, A.J. Chorin, V.M. Prostokishin “On the problem of turbulent flows in pipes at very large Reynolds numbers (reply to comment by I I Vigdorovich [Phys. Usp. 58 (2015); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 213 (2015)] on "Turbulent flows at very large Reynolds numbers: new lessons learned" [Phys. Usp. 57 250 (2014); Usp. Fiz. Nauk184 265 (2014)])” Phys. Usp. 58 199–201 (2015)
  7. G.R. Ivanitskii “Remembering a random choice kills alternatives (reply to comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?”)” Phys. Usp. 54 431–433 (2011)
  8. G.D. Shabanov “On relation between theoretical and experimental components in the papers on ball lightning (reply to M.L. Shmatov's comments [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 190 107 (2020)] on the paper "On the possibility of making natural ball lightning using a new pulse discharge type in the laboratory" [Phys. Usp. 62 92 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 95 (2019)])” Phys. Usp. 63 99–100 (2020)
  9. S.N. Vladimirov “Does the sign correlation of quasiperiodic oscillations with incommensurable frequencies generate deterministic chaos?” Phys. Usp. 47 205–208 (2004)
  10. I.I. Vigdorovich “Does the power formula describe turbulent velocity profiles in tubes? (comment on "Turbulent flows at very large Reynolds numbers: new lessons learned" [Phys. Usp. 57 250 (2014); ” Phys. Usp. 58 196–198 (2015)
  11. A.E. Dubinov, L.A. Mytareva “Is singularity-free cloaking possible? New cloaking ideas (a reply to comments on the paper “Invisible cloaking of material bodies using the wave flow method” [Phys. Usp. 53 455 (2010)])” Phys. Usp. 55 315–318 (2012)
  12. A.F. Bunkin, S.M. Pershin “Once again, on the observation of molecular rotational spectra in condensed media” Phys. Usp. 52 1283–1284 (2009)
  13. E.A. Arinstein “Relation between energy conservation and dynamics (Comment on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" by N.A. Vinokurov (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))” Phys. Usp. 58 309–310 (2015)
  14. G.B. Malykin, V.I. Pozdnyakova “On inconsistencies in the work of P Maraner (reply to comment [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 793 2016] to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of gravitational potential of Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 59 719–721 (2016)
  15. A.M. Cherepashchuk “Exotic aspects of black holes: an astronaut near the horizon (on the methodological note by A A Grib and Yu V Pavlov “Is it possible to see the infinite future of the Universe when falling into a black hole?”)” Phys. Usp. 52 861–862 (2009)
  16. A.F. Krupnov, M.Yu. Tretyakov “Comments on the paper “Coherent four-photon spectroscopy of low-frequency molecular librations in a liquid” by A F Bunkin, A A Nurmatov, and S M Pershin” Phys. Usp. 52 1273–1277 (2009)
  17. A.I. Lipkin, R.S. Nakhmanson et al “Readers comments on ‘Quantum mechanics: new experiments, new applications, new formulations’ by M B Menskii” Phys. Usp. 44 417–417 (2001)
  18. S.I. Vedeneev “Reply to L.S. Mazov's comments on the paper S.I. Vedeneev Phys. Usp. 64 890 (2021), Usp. Fiz. Nauk 191 937 (2021)” Phys. Usp., accepted
  19. M.V. Rybin, M.F. Limonov “Once again about supercavity modes (a response to the letter to the editors of Physics-Uspekhi from V.V. Klimov [Phys. Usp. 62 (10) (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 (10) 1131 (2019)] with comments on the review by M.V. Rybin and M.F. Limonov "Resonance effects in photonic crystals and metamaterials" [Phys. Usp. 62 (8) 823 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 (8) 881 (2019)])” Phys. Usp. 62 1279–1281 (2019)
  20. A.V. Melkikh “First principles of probability theory and some paradoxes in modern biology (comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?” by G R Ivanitskii)” Phys. Usp. 54 429–430 (2011)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions