RSS feeds
РусскийEnglish
Issue 4, 2024
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2011

 / 

May

←  →

Methodological notes


A rigorous minimum-assumption derivation of the Lorentz transformation


College of Physics Science and Technology, Heilongjiang University, Xuefu Road 74 , Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, 150080, China

The available derivations of the Lorentz transformation (LT) are of questionable validity because they introduce some assumptions in addition to Einstein’s two fundamental postulates or, even if they do not do so, are highly abstract and abstruse (as is the case with two or three ’exact’ derivations). The rigorous LT derivation proposed in this paper has only the constant speed of light and two thought experiments as its underlying assumptions. With the constant speed of light used to prove all the necessary assumptions, no additional assumptions are needed. Our systematic approach explains in a convincing way why stress is irrelevant to length contraction.

Fulltext pdf (124 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0181.201105g.0553
PACS: 01.40.−d, 03.30.+p (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0181.201105g.0553
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2011/5/f/
000294814900006
2-s2.0-80051883302
2011PhyU...54..529H
Citation: Huang X-B "A rigorous minimum-assumption derivation of the Lorentz transformation" Phys. Usp. 54 529–532 (2011)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 13th, September 2010, 25th, November 2010

Оригинал: Хуан С-Б «Строгий вывод преобразования Лоренца на основе минимальных предположений» УФН 181 553–556 (2011); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0181.201105g.0553

References (9) Cited by (1) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. Yu.I. Hovsepyan “Some notes on the relativistic Doppler effect” 41 941–944 (1998)
  2. E.G. Bessonov “Another route to the Lorentz transformations” 59 475–479 (2016)
  3. S.I. Blinnikov, L.B. Okun, M.I. Vysotskii “Critical velocities c/sqrt{3} and c/sqrt{2} in the general theory of relativity” 46 1099–1103 (2003)
  4. V.I. Ritus “Generalization of the k coefficient method in relativity to an arbitrary angle between the velocity of an observer (source) and the direction of the light ray from (to) a faraway source (observer) at rest” 63 601–610 (2020)
  5. G.B. Malykin “The relation of Thomas precession to Ishlinskii’s theorem as applied to the rotating image of a relativistically moving body” 42 505–509 (1999)
  6. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Force acting on a substance in an electromagnetic field” 52 937–943 (2009)
  7. G.B. Malykin “Sagnac effect in ring lasers and ring resonators. How does the refraction index of the optical medium influence the sensitivity to rotation?” 57 714–720 (2014)
  8. V.I. Ritus “Permutation asymmetry of the relativistic velocity addition law and non-Euclidean geometry” 51 709–721 (2008)
  9. V.I. Ritus “On the difference between Wigner’s and Møller’s approaches to the description of Thomas precession” 50 95–101 (2007)
  10. A.I. Musienko, L.I. Manevich “Classical mechanical analogs of relativistic effects” 47 797–820 (2004)
  11. G.B. Malykin “Application of the modified Duguay method for measuring the Lorentz contraction of a moving body length” 64 1058–1062 (2021)
  12. V.B. Morozov “On the question of the electromagnetic momentum of a charged body” 54 371–374 (2011)
  13. V.A. Aleshkevich “On special relativity teaching using modern experimental data” 55 1214–1231 (2012)
  14. P.B. Ivanov “On relativistic motion of a pair of particles having opposite signs of masses” 55 1232–1238 (2012)
  15. M.I. Krivoruchenko “Rotation of the swing plane of Foucault’s pendulum and Thomas spin precession: two sides of one coin” 52 821–829 (2009)
  16. G.B. Malykin “Para-Lorentz transformations” 52 263–266 (2009)
  17. J. Gaite “The relativistic virial theorem and scale invariance” 56 919–931 (2013)
  18. V.I. Ritus “Lagrange equations of motion of particles and photons in the Schwarzschild field” 58 1118–1123 (2015)
  19. L.I. Antonov “Macroscopic representation of the magnetization vector field in a magnetic substance” 46 1203–1207 (2003)
  20. G.B. Malykin “The Sagnac effect: correct and incorrect explanations” 43 1229 (2000)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions