Issues

 / 

2009

 / 

August

  

Methodological notes


Rotation of the swing plane of Foucault’s pendulum and Thomas spin precession: two sides of one coin


Russian Federation State Scientific Center ‘A.I. Alikhanov Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics’, ul. Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow, 117259, Russian Federation

Using elementary geometric tools, we apply essentially the same methods to derive expressions for the rotation angle of the swing plane of Foucault’s pendulum and the rotation angle of the spin of a relativistic particle moving in a circular orbit (the Thomas precession effect).

Fulltext pdf (241 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0179.200908e.0873
PACS: 01.65.+g, 02.40.Ky, 03.30.+p (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0179.200908e.0873
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2009/8/e/
000273727200005
2-s2.0-70549106011
2009PhyU...52..821K
Citation: Krivoruchenko M I "Rotation of the swing plane of Foucault's pendulum and Thomas spin precession: two sides of one coin" Phys. Usp. 52 821–829 (2009)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Криворученко М И «Вращение плоскости качания маятника Фуко и прецессия Томаса: две линии одного сюжета» УФН 179 873–882 (2009); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0179.200908e.0873

References (26) Cited by (4) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. V.I. Ritus “On the difference between Wigner’s and Møller’s approaches to the description of Thomas precessionPhys. Usp. 50 95–101 (2007)
  2. V.I. Ritus “Permutation asymmetry of the relativistic velocity addition law and non-Euclidean geometryPhys. Usp. 51 709–721 (2008)
  3. V.B. Morozov “On the question of the electromagnetic momentum of a charged bodyPhys. Usp. 54 371–374 (2011)
  4. V.A. Aleshkevich “On special relativity teaching using modern experimental dataPhys. Usp. 55 1214–1231 (2012)
  5. G.B. Malykin “The Sagnac effect: correct and incorrect explanationsPhys. Usp. 43 1229 (2000)
  6. G.B. Malykin “Para-Lorentz transformationsPhys. Usp. 52 263–266 (2009)
  7. Ya.A. Smorodinskii, V.A. Ugarov “Two paradoxes of the special theory of relativitySov. Phys. Usp. 15 340–346 (1972)
  8. G.B. Malykin “The relation of Thomas precession to Ishlinskii’s theorem as applied to the rotating image of a relativistically moving bodyPhys. Usp. 42 505–509 (1999)
  9. B.M. Bolotovskii, G.B. Malykin “Visible shape of moving bodiesPhys. Usp. 62 1012–1030 (2019)
  10. S.V. Petrov “Was Sommerfeld wrong? (To the history of the appearance of spin in relativistic wave equations)Phys. Usp. 63 721–724 (2020)
  11. V.S. Popov “Feynman disentangling оf noncommuting operators and group representation theoryPhys. Usp. 50 1217–1238 (2007)
  12. P.B. Ivanov “On relativistic motion of a pair of particles having opposite signs of massesPhys. Usp. 55 1232–1238 (2012)
  13. S.I. Blinnikov, L.B. Okun, M.I. Vysotskii “Critical velocities c/sqrt{3} and c/sqrt{2} in the general theory of relativityPhys. Usp. 46 1099–1103 (2003)
  14. V.I. Ritus “Lagrange equations of motion of particles and photons in the Schwarzschild fieldPhys. Usp. 58 1118–1123 (2015)
  15. E.G. Bessonov “Another route to the Lorentz transformationsPhys. Usp. 59 475–479 (2016)
  16. Yu.I. Hovsepyan “Some notes on the relativistic Doppler effectPhys. Usp. 41 941–944 (1998)
  17. S.I. Syrovatskii “On the problem of the ’retardation’ of the relativistic contraction of moving bodiesSov. Phys. Usp. 19 273–274 (1976)
  18. J. Gaite “The relativistic virial theorem and scale invariancePhys. Usp. 56 919–931 (2013)
  19. G.B. Malykin “Sagnac effect in ring lasers and ring resonators. How does the refraction index of the optical medium influence the sensitivity to rotation?Phys. Usp. 57 714–720 (2014)
  20. A.I. Musienko, L.I. Manevich “Classical mechanical analogs of relativistic effectsPhys. Usp. 47 797–820 (2004)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions