RSS feeds
РусскийEnglish
Issue 11, 2024
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2008

 / 

February

←  →

Letters to the editors


Sagnac effect in superfluid liquids

 a,  b
a CEA-Saclay/DSM/DRECAM/SPEC, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
b Laboratoire Charles Fabry de l'Institut d'Optique, UMR 8501 du CNRS, Campus Polytechnique, Palaiseau, RD128 - 91129, France

The interpretation of the Sagnac effect is re-examined in the context of recent cold atomic beam and superfluid experiments. A widespread misconception concerning the understanding of this effect in a superfluid liquid is discussed.

Fulltext pdf (452 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.1070/PU2008v051n02ABEH006425
PACS: 03.30.+p, 03.75.−b, 42.81.Pa (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU2008v051n02ABEH006425
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2008/2/j/
000256729400009
2-s2.0-45149122310
2008PhyU...51..205V
Citation: Varoquaux E, Varoquaux G "Sagnac effect in superfluid liquids" Phys. Usp. 51 205–208 (2008)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Вароко Е, Вароко Г «Эффект Саньяка в сверхтекучих жидкостях» УФН 178 217–221 (2008); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0178.200802k.0217

References (37) Cited by (3) Similar articles (12) ↓

  1. G.B. Malykin, V.I. Pozdnyakova “Supplement to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 58 828–829 (2015)
  2. P. Maraner “On the phase shift in a uniformly rotating Michelson interferometer (comment on "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results 1921—1926)" by G B Malykin and V I Pozdnyakova [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 59 716–718 (2016)
  3. G.B. Malykin, V.I. Pozdnyakova “On inconsistencies in the work of P Maraner (reply to comment [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 793 2016] to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of gravitational potential of Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 59 719–721 (2016)
  4. G.B. Malykin “Sagnac effect in a rotating frame of reference. Relativistic Zeno paradox” Phys. Usp. 45 907–909 (2002)
  5. V.G. Veselago, V.V. Shchavlev “On the relativistic invariance of the Minkowski and Abraham energy-momentum tensors” Phys. Usp. 53 317–318 (2010)
  6. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Negative group velocity electromagnetic waves and the energy—momentum tensor” Phys. Usp. 54 1285–1296 (2011)
  7. A.V. Shepelev “Cosmic microwave background and the Aristotelian ideas of motion” Phys. Usp. 48 95–96 (2005)
  8. G.B. Malykin “On the possibility of experimental verifying the second postulate of special relativity” Phys. Usp. 47 739–742 (2004)
  9. R.I. Khrapko “What is mass?” Phys. Usp. 43 1267–1270 (2000)
  10. L.B. Okun “Reply to the letter ’What is mass?’ by R I Khrapko” Phys. Usp. 43 1270–1275 (2000)
  11. A.V. Kukushkin “On the existence and physical meaning of the Zenneck wave” Phys. Usp. 52 755–756 (2009)
  12. M.A. Popov “In defence of quantum idealism” Phys. Usp. 46 1307–1309 (2003)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions