From the history of physics

Earlier studies of the Sagnac effect

Federal Research Center A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Ulyanova 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603000, Russian Federation

Studies of the Sagnac effect carried out during the latter part of the nineteenth and the first half of the twentieth century are reviewed. A discussion of the chronology issue shows, in particular, that O. Lodge was the first to recognize the possibility of the effect. It is also shown that, apart from detecting rotation, in most studies the improvement of the Fresnel-Fizeau drag coefficient in rotating reference frame was the primary concern. As possible directions for the development of Sagnac interferometry, a wider operational range for electromagnetic waves, the interference of material de Broglie waves, and the interference of acoustic and magnetic surface waves are considered.

PACS: 01.65.+g, 04.20.−q (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU1997v040n03ABEH000218
Citation: Malykin G B "Earlier studies of the Sagnac effect" Phys. Usp. 40 317–321 (1997)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Малыкин Г Б «Ранние исследования эффекта Саньяка» УФН 167 337–342 (1997); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0167.199703i.0337

References (60) Cited by (34) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. G.B. Malykin, S.A. Kharlamov “Topological phase in classical mechanics46 957–965 (2003)
  2. V.P. Vizgin “On the discovery of the gravitational field equations by Einstein and Hilbert: new materials44 1283–1298 (2001)
  3. G.B. Malykin “Noncommutative nature of the addition of noncollinear velocities in special relativity and the geometric phase method (commemorating the publication centennial of A Sommerfeld’s work)53 923–927 (2010)
  4. V.A. Fock “On the invariant form of the wave and motion equations for a charged point mass53 839–841 (2010)
  5. D.E. Burlankov “Gravity and absolute space. The works of Niels Bjern (1865-1909)47 833–844 (2004)
  6. F. Dyson “Birds and frogs in mathematics and physics53 825–834 (2010)
  7. I.M. Ternov, V.A. Bordovitsyn “Modern interpretation of J.I. Frenkel’s classical spin theory23 679–683 (1980)
  8. G.B. Malykin, V.S. Savchuk, E.A. Romanets “Lev Yakovlevich Strum and the hypothesis of the existence of tachyons55 1134–1139 (2012)
  9. G.A. Goncharov “American and Soviet H-bomb development programmes: historical background39 1033–1044 (1996)
  10. E.P. Likhtman “Supersymmetry — 30 years ago44 973–979 (2001)
  11. V.I. Sanyuk, A.D. Sukhanov “Dirac in 20th century physics: a centenary assessment46 937–956 (2003)
  12. M.I. Monastyrskii “John von Neumann47 1271–1280 (2004)
  13. B. Pontecorvo “Pages in the development of neutrino physics26 1087–1108 (1983)
  14. I.A. Shcherbakov “Development history of the laser54 65–71 (2011)
  15. A.P. Grinberg “On the history of study of isomerism23 848–857 (1980)
  16. V.P. Vizgin “The nuclear shield in the ’thirty-year war’ of physicists against ignorant criticism of modern physical theories42 1259–1283 (1999)
  17. M.A. El’yashevich, N.G. Kembrovskaya, L.M. Tomil’chik “Walter Ritz as a theoretical physicist and his research on the theory of atomic spectra38 435–455 (1995)
  18. I.L. Fabelinskii “The prediction and discovery of Rayleigh line fine structure43 89–103 (2000)
  19. Yu.I. Krivonosov “S.I. Vavilov’s manuscript letter to Stalin43 949–952 (2000)
  20. G.A. Goncharov, L.D. Ryabev “The development of the first Soviet atomic bomb44 71–93 (2001)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2023 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions