Issues

 / 

1993

 / 

August

  

Methodological notes


The tree of paradox


Federal Research Center A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Ulyanova 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603000, Russian Federation

The specific nature of the randomness arising when quantum subsystems interact (collide) is analyzed. It is shown that the Birkhoff–Khinchin ergodic theorem—the key theorem for classical statistics—or its analog is absent, in principle, in the quantum theory. Thus quantum probabilities cannot be defined within the ergodic concept. A metric definition of probability, based on von Neumann's theory of measurement, is proposed as a measure of comparison of a posteriori physical situation with the a priori situation. The workability of the adopted approach is demonstrated for random walk problems and the theory of thermal equilibrium.

Fulltext pdf (495 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.1070/PU1993v036n08ABEH002302
PACS: 03.65.Ud, 03.65.Ta, 05.40.Fb (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU1993v036n08ABEH002302
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/1993/8/d/
Citation: Mityugov V V "The tree of paradox" Phys. Usp. 36 (8) 744–753 (1993)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Îðèãèíàë: Ìèòþãîâ Â Â «Äåðåâî ïàðàäîêñà» ÓÔÍ 163 (8) 103–114 (1993); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0163.199308d.0103

References (29) Cited by (7) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. A.B. Brailovskii, V.L. Vaks, V.V. Mityugov “Quantum models of relaxation39 745–750 (1996)
  2. B.B. Kadomtsev “Irreversibility in quantum mechanics46 1183–1201 (2003)
  3. V.P. Demutskii, R.V. Polovin “Conceptual problems in quantum mechanics35 (10) 857–896 (1992)
  4. S.P. Vyatchanin, F.Ya. Khalili “’Interaction-free’ measurement: possibilities and limitations47 705–716 (2004)
  5. M.B. Mensky “Measurability of quantum fields and the energy—time uncertainty relation54 519–528 (2011)
  6. A.M. Zheltikov “The critique of quantum mind: measurement, consciousness, delayed choice, and lost coherence61 1016–1025 (2018)
  7. A.V. Belinsky “On David Bohm's 'pilot-wave' concept62 1268–1278 (2019)
  8. A.V. Belinsky “Wigner's friend paradox: does objective reality not exist?63 1256–1263 (2020)
  9. V.N. Tutubalin “Probability, computers, and the processing of experimental data36 (7) 628–641 (1993)
  10. V.B. Braginskii “Adolescent years of experimental physics46 81–87 (2003)
  11. V.V. Mityugov “Thermodynamics of simple quantum systems43 631–637 (2000)
  12. A.V. Belinskii, A.S. Chirkin “Bernstein’s paradox of entangled quantum states56 1126–1131 (2013)
  13. A.I. Akhiezer, R.V. Polovin “Why IT IS impossible to introduce hidden parameters into quantum mechanics15 500–512 (1973)
  14. A.V. Belinsky, A.A. Klevtsov “Nonlocal classical "realism" and quantum superposition as the nonexistence of definite pre-measurement values of physical quantities61 313–319 (2018)
  15. A.S. Tarnovskii “A new representation of quantum mechanics33 (10) 862–864 (1990)
  16. D.N. Klyshko “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for energy-time variables32 555–563 (1989)
  17. F.Ya. Khalili “Zero-point oscillations, zero-point fluctuations, and fluctuations of zero-point oscillations46 293–307 (2003)
  18. Yu.E. Kuzovlev “Why nature needs 1/f-noise58 719–729 (2015)
  19. V.S. Pronskikh “Measurement problems: contemporary discussions and models63 192–200 (2020)
  20. A.A. Logunov “The theory of the classical gravitational field38 179–193 (1995)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions