Methodological notes

A legend about the photoemission discharge

Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prosp. Lavrent'eva 13, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation

It is shown that the currently advertised 'new form of discharge' (open discharge) — photoemission with virtually noneroding cathode and the 'anomalously high' (near unity) energy efficiency of electron beam (EB) formation --- cannot in fact be realized. In reality, such a discharge fits well into the familiar pattern of glow discharges controlled by heavy particle emission. Thus, in known EB sources, the energy efficiency of up to ≈0,8 is ensured by fast atoms from ion charge exchange in strong discharge fields. However, charge multiplication and the cathode-directed ion drift are both proportional to the flow of cathode electrons (including photoemitted ones), implying that the energy efficiency cannot increase. It is incorrect efficiency measurement methodology, which gives a result of about unity efficiency.

Fulltext pdf (513 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2017.10.038360
Keywords: open discharge, electron emission from the cathode, electron beams in discharge
PACS: 52.80.Tn
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2017.10.038360
Citation: Sorokin A R "A legend about the photoemission discharge" Phys. Usp. 61 1234–1240 (2018)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 7th, September 2017, revised: 24th, January 2018, 26th, October 2017

Оригинал: Сорокин А Р «Легенда о фотоэмиссионном разряде» УФН 188 1354–1360 (2018); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2017.10.038360

References (43) Cited by (8) ↓ Similar articles (7)

  1. Kozyrev A, Tarasenko V Plasma 7 201 (2024)
  2. Ma Y, Lyu X et al Contrib. Plasma Phys 64 (4) (2024)
  3. Bokhan P A, Gugin P P et al J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 505208 (2021)
  4. Panchenko A N, Sorokin D A, Tarasenko V F Progress In Quantum Electronics 76 100314 (2021)
  5. Tarasenko V Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 034001 (2020)
  6. Bokhan P A, Gugin P P et al Tech. Phys. Lett. 46 1020 (2020)
  7. Bokhan P A, Gugin P P et al Plasma Phys. Rep. 45 1035 (2019)
  8. Bokhan P A Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 188 1361 (2018)

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions