RSS feeds
РусскийEnglish
Issue 9, 2026
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2016

 / 

July

←  →

Letters to the editors


On inconsistencies in the work of P Maraner (reply to comment [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 793 2016] to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of gravitational potential of Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])

 a,  b
a Federal Research Center A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Ulyanova 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603000, Russian Federation
b Institute of Microstructure Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Ulyanova 46, Nizhnii Novgorod, 603600, Russian Federation

We consider the distributions of the scalar gravitational potential of Coriolis forces in different parts of the shoulder rotating equal-arms Michelson interferometer. It results in view of the very small difference between the phase of light in the shoulders of the Michelson interferometer, in comparison with the phase difference due to the quadratic Sagnac effect. It has been shown that it is there is an effect discussed earlier by P. Maraner, which is higher approximation quadratic Sagnac effect.

Fulltext pdf (88 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2016.02.037737
Keywords: Michelson interferometer, Coriolis force, gravitational potential, Earth orbital motion rotation
PACS: 03.30.+p
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2016.02.037737
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2016/7/i/
000386357600009
2-s2.0-84991585187
2016PhyU...59..719M
Citation: Malykin G B, Pozdnyakova V I "On inconsistencies in the work of P Maraner (reply to comment [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 793 2016] to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of gravitational potential of Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])" Phys. Usp. 59 719–721 (2016)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 3rd, February 2016, 3rd, February 2016

Оригинал: Малыкин Г Б, Позднякова В И «Возражения к комментарию П. Маранера (Ответ на комментарий П. Маранера [УФН 186 793 (2016)] к статье "Квадратичный эффект Саньяка: влияние гравитационного потенциала силы Кориолиса на разность фаз в плечах вращающегося интерферометра Майкельсона (объяснение результатов экспериментов Д.К. Миллера 1921—1926 гг.)" [УФН 185 431 (2015)]» УФН 186 796–798 (2016); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2016.02.037737

References (19) Cited by (2) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. P. Maraner “On the phase shift in a uniformly rotating Michelson interferometer (comment on "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results 1921—1926)" by G B Malykin and V I Pozdnyakova [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 59 716–718 (2016)
  2. G.B. Malykin, V.I. Pozdnyakova “Supplement to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 58 828–829 (2015)
  3. G.B. Malykin “Sagnac effect in a rotating frame of reference. Relativistic Zeno paradox” Phys. Usp. 45 907–909 (2002)
  4. G.B. Malykin “On the possibility of experimental verifying the second postulate of special relativity” Phys. Usp. 47 739–742 (2004)
  5. E. Varoquaux, G. Varoquaux “Sagnac effect in superfluid liquids” Phys. Usp. 51 205–208 (2008)
  6. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Negative group velocity electromagnetic waves and the energy—momentum tensor” Phys. Usp. 54 1285–1296 (2011)
  7. L.B. Okun “Reply to the letter ’What is mass?’ by R I Khrapko” Phys. Usp. 43 1270–1275 (2000)
  8. V.G. Veselago, V.V. Shchavlev “On the relativistic invariance of the Minkowski and Abraham energy-momentum tensors” Phys. Usp. 53 317–318 (2010)
  9. G.R. Ivanitskii “Remembering a random choice kills alternatives (reply to comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?”)” Phys. Usp. 54 431–433 (2011)
  10. A.V. Shepelev “Cosmic microwave background and the Aristotelian ideas of motion” Phys. Usp. 48 95–96 (2005)
  11. R.I. Khrapko “What is mass?” Phys. Usp. 43 1267–1270 (2000)
  12. G.I. Barenblatt, A.J. Chorin, V.M. Prostokishin “On the problem of turbulent flows in pipes at very large Reynolds numbers (reply to comment by I I Vigdorovich [Phys. Usp. 58 (2015); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 213 (2015)] on "Turbulent flows at very large Reynolds numbers: new lessons learned" [Phys. Usp. 57 250 (2014); Usp. Fiz. Nauk184 265 (2014)])” Phys. Usp. 58 199–201 (2015)
  13. N.A. Vinokurov “Relation between energy conservation and equations of motion (A reply to the comment by E A Arinshtein (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 333 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 (3) (2015)]) on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))” Phys. Usp. 58 311–312 (2015)
  14. A.V. Borisov, I.S. Mamaev “Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics” Phys. Usp. 58 1220–1222 (2015)
  15. G.R. Ivanitskii “Memory about the past is beneficial for survival and reproduction (reply to comment (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 182 1235 (2012) [Phys. Usp. 55 1152 (2012)]) by V I Klyatskin on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics” (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 180 337 (2010) [Phys. Usp. 53 327 (2010)]) by G R Ivanitskii)” Phys. Usp. 55 1155–1160 (2012)
  16. V.F. Zhuravlev “Once more on the dynamics of the rattleback (comment on "Strange attractors in rattleback dynamics" by A.V. Borisov and I.S. Mamaev [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 173 407 (2003); Phys. Usp. 46 393 (2003)] and "Nonlinear dynamics of the rattleback: a nonholonomic model" by A.V. Borisov, A.O. Kazakov, S.P. Kuznetsov [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 493 (2014); Phys. Usp. 57 453 (2014)])” Phys. Usp. 58 1218–1219 (2015)
  17. G.D. Shabanov “On relation between theoretical and experimental components in the papers on ball lightning (reply to M.L. Shmatov's comments [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 190 107 (2020)] on the paper "On the possibility of making natural ball lightning using a new pulse discharge type in the laboratory" [Phys. Usp. 62 92 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 95 (2019)])” Phys. Usp. 63 99–100 (2020)
  18. A.E. Dubinov, L.A. Mytareva “Is singularity-free cloaking possible? New cloaking ideas (a reply to comments on the paper “Invisible cloaking of material bodies using the wave flow method” [Phys. Usp. 53 455 (2010)])” Phys. Usp. 55 315–318 (2012)
  19. M.A. Bol’shov, A.A. Makarov, V.R. Mironenko “On the observation of molecular rotational spectra in condensed media” Phys. Usp. 52 1279–1281 (2009)
  20. A.F. Bunkin, S.M. Pershin “Once again, on the observation of molecular rotational spectra in condensed media” Phys. Usp. 52 1283–1284 (2009)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions