RSS feeds
РусскийEnglish
Issue 11, 2024
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2016

 / 

July

←  →

Letters to the editors


On inconsistencies in the work of P Maraner (reply to comment [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 793 2016] to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of gravitational potential of Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])

 a,  b
a Federal Research Center A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Ulyanova 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603000, Russian Federation
b Institute of Microstructure Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Ulyanova 46, Nizhnii Novgorod, 603600, Russian Federation

We consider the distributions of the scalar gravitational potential of Coriolis forces in different parts of the shoulder rotating equal-arms Michelson interferometer. It results in view of the very small difference between the phase of light in the shoulders of the Michelson interferometer, in comparison with the phase difference due to the quadratic Sagnac effect. It has been shown that it is there is an effect discussed earlier by P. Maraner, which is higher approximation quadratic Sagnac effect.

Fulltext pdf (88 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2016.02.037737
Keywords: Michelson interferometer, Coriolis force, gravitational potential, Earth orbital motion rotation
PACS: 03.30.+p
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.2016.02.037737
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2016/7/i/
000386357600009
2-s2.0-84991585187
2016PhyU...59..719M
Citation: Malykin G B, Pozdnyakova V I "On inconsistencies in the work of P Maraner (reply to comment [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 186 793 2016] to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of gravitational potential of Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])" Phys. Usp. 59 719–721 (2016)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 3rd, February 2016, 3rd, February 2016

Оригинал: Малыкин Г Б, Позднякова В И «Возражения к комментарию П. Маранера (Ответ на комментарий П. Маранера [УФН 186 793 (2016)] к статье "Квадратичный эффект Саньяка: влияние гравитационного потенциала силы Кориолиса на разность фаз в плечах вращающегося интерферометра Майкельсона (объяснение результатов экспериментов Д.К. Миллера 1921—1926 гг.)" [УФН 185 431 (2015)]» УФН 186 796–798 (2016); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2016.02.037737

References (19) Cited by (2) Similar articles (12) ↓

  1. G.B. Malykin, V.I. Pozdnyakova “Supplement to the paper "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results, 1921—1926)" (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015) [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 58 828–829 (2015)
  2. P. Maraner “On the phase shift in a uniformly rotating Michelson interferometer (comment on "Quadratic Sagnac effect — the influence of the gravitational potential of the Coriolis force on the phase difference between the arms of a rotating Michelson interferometer (an explanation of D C Miller's experimental results 1921—1926)" by G B Malykin and V I Pozdnyakova [Phys. Usp. 58 398 (2015); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 431 (2015)])” Phys. Usp. 59 716–718 (2016)
  3. G.B. Malykin “Sagnac effect in a rotating frame of reference. Relativistic Zeno paradox” Phys. Usp. 45 907–909 (2002)
  4. G.B. Malykin “On the possibility of experimental verifying the second postulate of special relativity” Phys. Usp. 47 739–742 (2004)
  5. E. Varoquaux, G. Varoquaux “Sagnac effect in superfluid liquids” Phys. Usp. 51 205–208 (2008)
  6. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Negative group velocity electromagnetic waves and the energy—momentum tensor” Phys. Usp. 54 1285–1296 (2011)
  7. V.G. Veselago, V.V. Shchavlev “On the relativistic invariance of the Minkowski and Abraham energy-momentum tensors” Phys. Usp. 53 317–318 (2010)
  8. A.V. Shepelev “Cosmic microwave background and the Aristotelian ideas of motion” Phys. Usp. 48 95–96 (2005)
  9. R.I. Khrapko “What is mass?” Phys. Usp. 43 1267–1270 (2000)
  10. L.B. Okun “Reply to the letter ’What is mass?’ by R I Khrapko” Phys. Usp. 43 1270–1275 (2000)
  11. G.I. Barenblatt, A.J. Chorin, V.M. Prostokishin “On the problem of turbulent flows in pipes at very large Reynolds numbers (reply to comment by I I Vigdorovich [Phys. Usp. 58 (2015); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 185 213 (2015)] on "Turbulent flows at very large Reynolds numbers: new lessons learned" [Phys. Usp. 57 250 (2014); Usp. Fiz. Nauk184 265 (2014)])” Phys. Usp. 58 199–201 (2015)
  12. A.V. Borisov, I.S. Mamaev “Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics” Phys. Usp. 58 1220–1222 (2015)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions