Issues

 / 

2014

 / 

January

  

Methodological notes


Magnetoplasticity and the physics of earthquakes. Can a catastrophe be prevented?


Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Kosygina, 4, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

The reasons for the elastic energy accumulation in a lithospheric macroreactor — a seismic focus — are discussed. The nonlinear kinetics of the phenomena of an earthquake, a chain chemical explosion, and a nuclear explosion are analyzed. The transition from a stationary regime to an explosion in these three processes occurs as a critical phenomenon with critical parameters representing the concentrations of dislocations, active chemical centers, and neutrons, respectively. It is proposed to stimulate the slow relaxation of the elastic energy of the deformation stress of the seismic focus by low-frequency microwaves, which provide the accelerated motion of dislocations, reduce the yield limit, and increase plasticity. This phenomenon, known as magnetoplasticity in solid-state physics, can be used to keep the seismic focus far from a critical catastrophic regime by artificially stimulating its slow relaxation. The observed features of the influence of magnetic storms on the earthquake dynamics are in principle consistent with the concept of the stimulated magnetoplasticity of the seismic focus as a means to avoid a catastrophe.

Fulltext pdf (458 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0184.201401e.0101
PACS: 61.72.−y, 62.20.−x, 91.30.Px (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0184.201401e.0101
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2014/1/e/
000334343500005
2-s2.0-84898910265
2014PhyU...57...92B
Citation: Buchachenko A L "Magnetoplasticity and the physics of earthquakes. Can a catastrophe be prevented?" Phys. Usp. 57 92–98 (2014)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 3rd, April 2013, 11th, June 2013

Оригинал: Бучаченко А Л «Магнитопластичность и физика землетрясений. Можно ли предотвратить катастрофу?» УФН 184 101–108 (2014); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0184.201401e.0101

References (58) Cited by (28) Similar articles (13) ↓

  1. V.I. Alshits, E.V. Darinskaya et alDislocation kinetics in nonmagnetic crystals: a look through a magnetic windowPhys. Usp. 60 305–318 (2017)
  2. A.V. Guglielmi “Foreshocks and aftershocks of strong earthquakes in the light of catastrophe theoryPhys. Usp. 58 384–397 (2015)
  3. A.M. Fridman, E.V. Polyachenko, N.R. Nasyrkanov “On some correlations in seismodynamics and on two components of Earth’s seismic activityPhys. Usp. 53 291–300 (2010)
  4. V.I. Alshits, V.N. Lyubimov “Acoustics and optics of absorptive crystals: a universal formalism for topological effectsPhys. Usp. 56 1021–1037 (2013)
  5. B.I. Sturman “Collision integral for elastic scattering of electrons and phononsSov. Phys. Usp. 27 881–884 (1984)
  6. M.Ya. Agre “Multipole expansions in magnetostaticsPhys. Usp. 54 167–180 (2011)
  7. Yu.N. Barabanenkov, S.A. Nikitov, M.Yu. Barabanenkov “Quantum fluctuations in magnetic nanostructuresPhys. Usp. 62 82–91 (2019)
  8. A.A. Shatskii, I.D. Novikov, N.S. Kardashev “A dynamic model of the wormhole and the Multiverse modelPhys. Usp. 51 457–464 (2008)
  9. N.I. Shakura, K.A. Postnov et alMagnetorotational instability in Keplerian disks: a nonlocal approachPhys. Usp. 66 1262–1276 (2023)
  10. G.S. Golitsyn “A N Kolmogorov's 1934 paper is the basis for explaining the statistics of natural phenomena of the macrocosmPhys. Usp. 67 80–90 (2024)
  11. K.P. Belov “Pyromagnetic effect in ferrimagnets with a ’weak’ sublatticePhys. Usp. 43 407–413 (2000)
  12. A.A. Kolokolov, G.V. Skrotskii “Interference of reactive components of an electromagnetic fieldSov. Phys. Usp. 35 (12) 1089–1093 (1992)
  13. G.T. Zatsepin, Yu.A. Nechin, G.B. Khristiansen “Use of the magnetic induction of iron in cosmic-ray and high-energy physicsSov. Phys. Usp. 30 1007–1008 (1987)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions