Issues

 / 

2012

 / 

December

  

Methodological notes


On relativistic motion of a pair of particles having opposite signs of masses


Astro Space Centre, Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 84/32, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

In this methodological note, we consider, in a weak-field limit, the relativistic linear motion of two particles with masses of opposite signs and a small difference between their absolute values: $m_{1,2}=\pm (\mu\pm \Delta \mu) $, $\mu > 0$, $|\Delta \mu | \ll \mu$. In 1957, H’Bondi showed in the framework of both Newtonian analysis and General Relativity that, when the relative motion of particles is absent, such a pair can be accelerated indefinitely. We generalize the results of his paper to account for the small nonzero difference between the velocities of the particles. Assuming that the weak-field limit holds and the dynamical system is conservative, an elementary treatment of the problem based on the laws of energy and momentum conservation shows that the system can be accelerated indefinitely, or attain very large asymptotic values of the Lorentz factor $gamma$. The system experiences indefinite acceleration when its energy-momentum vector is null and the mass difference $\Delta \mu \le 0$. When the modulus of the square of the norm of the energy-momentum vector, $|N^2|$, is sufficiently small, the system can be accelerated to very large $\gamma \propto |N^2|^{-1}$. It is stressed that, when only leading terms in the ratio of a characteristic gravitational radius to the distance between the particles are retained, our elementary analysis leads to equations of motion equivalent to those derived from relativistic weak-field equations of motion by Havas and Goldberg in 1962. Thus, in the weak-field approximation it is possible to bring the system to the state with extremely high values of $\gamma$. The positive energy carried by the particle with positive mass may be conveyed to other physical bodies, say by intercepting this particle with a target. If we suppose that there is a process of production of such pairs and the particles with positive mass are intercepted, while the negative mass particles are expelled from the region of space occupied by the physical bodies of interest, this scheme could provide a persistent transfer of positive energy to the bodies, which may be classified as ’perpetual motion of the third kind’. Additionally, we critically evaluate some recent claims regarding the problem.

Fulltext pdf (517 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0182.201212d.1319
PACS: 03.30.+p, 04.20.−q, 47.75.+f (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0182.201212d.1319
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2012/12/d/
000315989900004
2-s2.0-84875145169
2012PhyU...55.1232I
Citation: Ivanov P B "On relativistic motion of a pair of particles having opposite signs of masses" Phys. Usp. 55 1232–1238 (2012)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Received: 26th, July 2011, revised: 31st, December 2011, 17th, February 2012

Оригинал: Иванов П Б «О релятивистском движении двух тел с массами противоположного знака» УФН 182 1319–1326 (2012); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0182.201212d.1319

References (12) Cited by (3) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. A.A. Shatskiy, I.D. Novikov, N.S. Kardashev “The Kepler problem and collisions of negative masses54 381–385 (2011)
  2. A.A. Logunov “The theory of the classical gravitational field38 179–193 (1995)
  3. V.I. Ritus “Lagrange equations of motion of particles and photons in the Schwarzschild field58 1118–1123 (2015)
  4. V.B. Morozov “On the question of the electromagnetic momentum of a charged body54 371–374 (2011)
  5. A.A. Logunov “The relativistic theory of gravitation33 (8) 663–668 (1990)
  6. A.A. Shatskii, I.D. Novikov, N.S. Kardashev “A dynamic model of the wormhole and the Multiverse model51 457–464 (2008)
  7. V.I. Ritus “On the difference between Wigner’s and Møller’s approaches to the description of Thomas precession50 95–101 (2007)
  8. S.I. Blinnikov, L.B. Okun, M.I. Vysotskii “Critical velocities c/sqrt{3} and c/sqrt{2} in the general theory of relativity46 1099–1103 (2003)
  9. L.B. Okun, K.G. Selivanov, V.L. Telegdi “Gravitation, photons, clocks42 1045–1050 (1999)
  10. V.A. Aleshkevich “On special relativity teaching using modern experimental data55 1214–1231 (2012)
  11. J. Gaite “The relativistic virial theorem and scale invariance56 919–931 (2013)
  12. R.I. Khrapko “Gravitational mass of the photons58 1115–1117 (2015)
  13. M.I. Krivoruchenko “Rotation of the swing plane of Foucault’s pendulum and Thomas spin precession: two sides of one coin52 821–829 (2009)
  14. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Force acting on a substance in an electromagnetic field52 937–943 (2009)
  15. V.I. Ritus “Permutation asymmetry of the relativistic velocity addition law and non-Euclidean geometry51 709–721 (2008)
  16. I.D. Novikov “Antigravitation in the Universe61 692–696 (2018)
  17. B.M. Bolotovskii, G.B. Malykin “Visible shape of moving bodies62 1012–1030 (2019)
  18. A.I. Musienko, L.I. Manevich “Classical mechanical analogs of relativistic effects47 797–820 (2004)
  19. Yu.I. Hovsepyan “Some notes on the relativistic Doppler effect41 941–944 (1998)
  20. L.P. Grishchuk “The general theory of relativity: familiar and unfamiliar33 (8) 669–676 (1990)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions