RSS feeds
РусскийEnglish
Issue 10, 2026
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2009

 / 

January

←  →

Methodological notes


Direct observations of the viscosity of Earth’s outer core and extrapolation of measurements of the viscosity of liquid iron

 a,  b,  c
a Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada
b Institute for High Pressure Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kaluzhskoe shosse 14, Troitsk, Moscow, 108840, Russian Federation
c Sander Geophysics Ltd., 260 Hunt Club Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 1K2, Canada

Estimates vary widely as to the viscosity of Earth’s outer fluid core. Directly observed viscosity is usually orders of magnitude higher than the values extrapolated from high-pressure high-temperature laboratory experiments, which are close to those for liquid iron at atmospheric pressure. It turned out that this discrepancy can be removed by extrapolating via the widely known Arrhenius activation model modified by lifting the commonly used assumption of pressure-independent activation volume (which is possible due to the discovery that at high pressures the activation volume increases strongly with pressure, resulting in 102 Pa s at the top of the fluid core, and in 1011 Pa s at its bottom). There are of course many uncertainties affecting this extrapolation process. This paper reviews two viscosity determination methods, one for the top and the other for the bottom of the outer core, the former of which relies on the decay of free core nutations and yields 2371 ± 1530 Pa s, while the other relies on the reduction in the rotational splitting of the two equatorial translational modes of the solid inner core oscillations and yields an average of 1.247 ± 0.035 × 1011 Pa s. Encouraged by the good performance of the Arrhenius extrapolation, a differential form of the Arrhenius activation model is used to interpolate along the melting temperature curve and to find the viscosity profile across the entire outer core. The viscosity variation is found to be nearly log-linear between the measured boundary values.

Fulltext pdf (723 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0179.200901d.0091
PACS: 66.20.−d, 91.35.−x, 93.85.−q (all)
DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0179.200901d.0091
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2009/1/d/
000266708800004
2-s2.0-67849111476
2009PhyU...52...79S
Citation: Smylie D E, Brazhkin V V, Palmer A "Direct observations of the viscosity of Earth's outer core and extrapolation of measurements of the viscosity of liquid iron" Phys. Usp. 52 79–92 (2009)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Смайли Д Е, Бражкин В В, Палмер А «Прямые наблюдения вязкости внешнего ядра Земли и экстраполяция измерений вязкости жидкого железа» УФН 179 91–105 (2009); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0179.200901d.0091

References (60) Cited by (27) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. V.N. Zharkov “On estimating the molecular viscosity of the Earth’s outer core: comment on the paper by D E Smylie et al.” Phys. Usp. 52 93–95 (2009)
  2. D.E. Smylie, V.V. Brazhkin, A. Palmer “Reply to comment by V N Zharkov “On estimating the molecular viscosity of the Earth’s outer core”” Phys. Usp. 52 96–96 (2009)
  3. V.V. Brazhkin “'Quantum' values of the extrema of 'classical' macroscopic quantities” Phys. Usp. 66 1154–1163 (2023)
  4. V.V. Brazhkin “Can glassforming liquids be 'simple'?” Phys. Usp. 62 623–629 (2019)
  5. Z.G. Bazhanova, V.V. Roizen, A.R. Oganov “High-pressure behavior of the Fe—S system and composition of the Earth's inner core” Phys. Usp. 60 1025–1032 (2017)
  6. V.V. Brazhkin “Why does statistical mechanics 'work' in condensed matter?” Phys. Usp. 64 1049–1057 (2021)
  7. V.V. Brazhkin, R.N. Voloshin et al “Phase equilibria in partially open systems under pressure: the decomposition of stoichiometric GeO2 oxide” Phys. Usp. 46 1283–1289 (2003)
  8. M.V. Kondrin, Yu.B. Lebed’ et al “On the problem of thermodynamic fluctuations in computer simulations” Phys. Usp. 68 941–946 (2025)
  9. V.V. Brazhkin “The fundamental triple point of substances on the phase diagram: the secret becomes clear” Phys. Usp. 69 606–614 (2026)
  10. V.V. Brazhkin “Interparticle interaction in condensed media: some elements are ’more equal than others’” Phys. Usp. 52 369–376 (2009)
  11. A.V. Belinsky, A.A. Klevtsov “Nonlocal classical "realism" and quantum superposition as the nonexistence of definite pre-measurement values of physical quantities” Phys. Usp. 61 313–319 (2018)
  12. V.P. Makarov, A.A. Rukhadze “Material equations and Maxwell equations for isotropic media; waves with negative group velocity and negative values of ε (ω) and μ (ω)” Phys. Usp. 62 487–495 (2019)
  13. A.A. Grib, Yu.V. Pavlov “Is it possible to see the infinite future of the Universe when falling into a black hole?” Phys. Usp. 52 257–261 (2009)
  14. G.I. Broman, O.V. Rudenko “Submerged Landau jet: exact solutions, their meaning and application” Phys. Usp. 53 91–98 (2010)
  15. S.G. Karshenboim “New recommended values of the fundamental physical constants (CODATA 2006)” Phys. Usp. 51 1019–1026 (2008)
  16. M.B. Mensky “Measurability of quantum fields and the energy—time uncertainty relation” Phys. Usp. 54 519–528 (2011)
  17. F.Ya. Khalili “Zero-point oscillations, zero-point fluctuations, and fluctuations of zero-point oscillations” Phys. Usp. 46 293–307 (2003)
  18. V.G. Niz’ev “Dipole-wave theory of electromagnetic diffraction” Phys. Usp. 45 553–559 (2002)
  19. P.A. Bokhan “On physical processes in the "open" discharge” Phys. Usp. 61 1241–1247 (2018)
  20. K.Yu. Todyshev “Measuring the inclusive cross section of e+e− annihilation into hadrons in the pre-asymptotic energy range” Phys. Usp. 63 929–939 (2020)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions