Issues

 / 

2001

 / 

April

←  →

Letters to the editors


Readers comments on ‘Quantum mechanics: new experiments, new applications, new formulations’ by M B Menskii

 a, ,  b,  c,  d,  e,  f
a Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Institutskii per. 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, 141700, Russian Federation
b Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prosp. akad. Lavrenteva 11, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
c Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Leninskie Gory 1 build. 2, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
d Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Kosygina 2, Moscow, 119334, Russian Federation
e V.N. Karazin Khar'kov National University, pl. Svobody 4, Khar'kov, 61077, Ukraine
f Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Today in the world literature, as at certain times in the past, are issues actively debated related to the interpretation and, more generally, to the foundations of quantum theory. At the same time these issues do not receive adequate treatment in the Russian-language physical publications. For this reason, Usp. Fiz. Nauk recently published a review by M B Menskii entitled ’Quantum mechanics: new experiments, new applications, new formulations of old problems’ (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 170 (6) 631 (2000) [Phys. Usp. 43 585 (2000)]). The editorial preface to this paper invited the readers to make their contributions to the discussion of the foundations of quantum theory. Some letters have been received and are presented below. Wishing to ensure free expression, we did not subject these letters to peer review, and take no responsibility for their content. We believe that such an approach is more or less justified by the current situation.

Fulltext pdf (133 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.1070/PU2001v044n04ABEH001594
PACS: 03.65.Yz
DOI: 10.1070/PU2001v044n04ABEH001594
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2001/4/e/
Citation: Lipkin A I, Nakhmanson R S, Pilan A M, Panov A D, Lesovik G B, Tsekhmistro I Z, Menskii M B "Readers comments on ‘Quantum mechanics: new experiments, new applications, new formulations’ by M B Menskii" Phys. Usp. 44 417–417 (2001)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Оригинал: Липкин А И, Нахмансон Р С, Пилан А М, Панов А Д, Лесовик Г Б, Цехмистро И З, Менский М Б «Отклики читателей на статью М.Б. Менского "Квантовая механика: новые эксперименты, новые приложения и новые формулировки старых вопросов"» УФН 171 437–437 (2001); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0171.200104f.0437

References (9) Similar articles (20) ↓

  1. A.I. Lipkin “Does the phenomenon of ‘reduction of the wave function’ exist in measurements in quantum mechanics?” Phys. Usp. 44 417–421 (2001)
  2. R.S. Nakhmanson “Physical interpretation of quantum mechanics” Phys. Usp. 44 421–424 (2001)
  3. A.M. Pilan “Reality and the main question of quantum information” Phys. Usp. 44 424–427 (2001)
  4. A.D. Panov “On the problem of selection of an alternative in quantum measurement” Phys. Usp. 44 427–429 (2001)
  5. G.B. Lesovik “Theory of measurements and the collapse of the wave function” Phys. Usp. 44 429–431 (2001)
  6. I.Z. Tsekhmistro “Implicative logical nature of quantum correlations” Phys. Usp. 44 432–438 (2001)
  7. A.I. Golokhvastov “Quantum mechanics in the experimenter’s eyes (comment on the article by M B Menskii)” Phys. Usp. 45 783–786 (2002)
  8. M.B. Menskii “Quantum measurement: decoherence and consciousness” Phys. Usp. 44 438–442 (2001)
  9. B.V. Novikov “On the experimental discovery of Mandelstam-Brillouin scattering” Phys. Usp. 43 105–107 (2000)
  10. A.V. Belinskii “Quantum nonlocality and the absence of a priori values for measurable quantities in experiments with photons” Phys. Usp. 46 877–881 (2003)
  11. E. Varoquaux, G. Varoquaux “Sagnac effect in superfluid liquids” Phys. Usp. 51 205–208 (2008)
  12. G.D. Shabanov “Lightning ball: experiments on creation and hypotheses (comment on “Energy density calculations for ball-lightning-like luminous silicon balls” by G S Paiva, J V Ferreira, C C Bastos, M V P dos Santos, A C Pavão)” Phys. Usp. 53 215–216 (2010)
  13. D. Song “Einstein’s Moon” Phys. Usp. 55 942–943 (2012)
  14. E.A. Arinstein “Relation between energy conservation and dynamics (Comment on "Analytical mechanics and field theory: derivation of equations from energy conservation" by N.A. Vinokurov (Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 641 (2014) [Phys. Usp. 57 593 (2014)]))” Phys. Usp. 58 309–310 (2015)
  15. A.V. Borisov, I.S. Mamaev “Notes on new friction models and nonholonomic mechanics” Phys. Usp. 58 1220–1222 (2015)
  16. G.D. Shabanov “On relation between theoretical and experimental components in the papers on ball lightning (reply to M.L. Shmatov's comments [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 190 107 (2020)] on the paper "On the possibility of making natural ball lightning using a new pulse discharge type in the laboratory" [Phys. Usp. 62 92 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 95 (2019)])” Phys. Usp. 63 99–100 (2020)
  17. I.S. Burmistrov “On the microscopic approach to describing spin torques in two-dimensional Rashba ferromagnets” Phys. Usp. 68 634–635 (2025)
  18. A.V. Kukushkin “On the existence and physical meaning of the Zenneck wave” Phys. Usp. 52 755–756 (2009)
  19. A.V. Melkikh “First principles of probability theory and some paradoxes in modern biology (comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?” by G R Ivanitskii)” Phys. Usp. 54 429–430 (2011)
  20. G.R. Ivanitskii “Remembering a random choice kills alternatives (reply to comment on “21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?”)” Phys. Usp. 54 431–433 (2011)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2026 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions