Letters to the editors

Reply to the letter by M V Fok received by the Physics-Uspekhi Editorial Board

Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
Fulltext is available at IOP
PACS: 87.10.+e, 87.15.−v, 87.90.+y, 89.70.+c (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU2001v044n10ABEH001008
Citation: Chernavskii D S "Reply to the letter by M V Fok received by the Physics-Uspekhi Editorial Board" Phys. Usp. 44 1093–1094 (2001)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

:    «   ..   » 171 1147–1147 (2001); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0171.200110s.1147

Cited by (1) Similar articles (7) ↓

  1. M.V. Fok “On D S Chernavskii’s paper ’’The origin of life and thinking from the viewpoint of modern physics’’44 1093–1093 (2001)
  2. A.Yu. Grosberg “A few remarks evoked by Binhi and Savin’s review on magnetobiology46 1113–1116 (2003)
  3. V.V. Serkov “On the galvanomagnetic "paradox" (Reply to Letter to Editor by T. S. Zhuravleva)10 116–116 (1967)
  4. V.I. Alshits, V.N. Lyubimov “On the anniversary of the fruitful idea (a reply to comments by A V Guglielmi)53 100–100 (2010)
  5. E.M. Belenov, V.A. Isakov et alReply to the letter of G. A. Askar’yan21 183–183 (1978)
  6. A.G. Shepelev “Letter to the Editor12 594–594 (1970)
  7. L.B. Okun “Reply to the letter ’What is mass?’ by R I Khrapko43 1270–1275 (2000)

The list is formed automatically.

© 1918–2021 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions