RSS feeds
ÐóññêèéEnglish
Issue 12, 2024
Volume year page
Issues Authors PACS Subscription For authors

Issues

 / 

2001

 / 

October

←  →

Letters to the editors


Reply to the letter by M V Fok received by the Physics-Uspekhi Editorial Board


Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
Fulltext pdf (94 KB)
Fulltext is also available at DOI: 10.1070/PU2001v044n10ABEH001008
PACS: 87.10.+e, 87.15.−v, 87.90.+y, 89.70.+c (all)
DOI: 10.1070/PU2001v044n10ABEH001008
URL: https://ufn.ru/en/articles/2001/10/s/
000173788400018
Citation: Chernavskii D S "Reply to the letter by M V Fok received by the Physics-Uspekhi Editorial Board" Phys. Usp. 44 1093–1094 (2001)
BibTexBibNote ® (generic)BibNote ® (RIS)MedlineRefWorks

Îðèãèíàë: ×åðíàâñêèé Ä Ñ «Îòâåò íà ïèñüìî Ì.Â. Ôîêà â ðåäàêöèþ ÓÔÍ» ÓÔÍ 171 1147–1147 (2001); DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0171.200110s.1147

Cited by (1) Similar articles (7) ↓

  1. M.V. Fok “On D S Chernavskii’s paper ’’The origin of life and thinking from the viewpoint of modern physics’’” Phys. Usp. 44 1093–1093 (2001)
  2. A.Yu. Grosberg “A few remarks evoked by Binhi and Savin’s review on magnetobiology” Phys. Usp. 46 1113–1116 (2003)
  3. V.V. Serkov “On the galvanomagnetic "paradox" (Reply to Letter to Editor by T. S. Zhuravleva)” Sov. Phys. Usp. 10 116–116 (1967)
  4. V.I. Alshits, V.N. Lyubimov “On the anniversary of the fruitful idea (a reply to comments by A V Guglielmi)” Phys. Usp. 53 100–100 (2010)
  5. E.M. Belenov, V.A. Isakov et al “Reply to the letter of G. A. Askar’yan” Sov. Phys. Usp. 21 183–183 (1978)
  6. A.G. Shepelev “Letter to the Editor” Sov. Phys. Usp. 12 594–594 (1970)
  7. L.B. Okun “Reply to the letter ’What is mass?’ by R I Khrapko” Phys. Usp. 43 1270–1275 (2000)

The list is formed automatically.
© 1918–2024 Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk
Email: ufn@ufn.ru Editorial office contacts About the journal Terms and conditions